Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Copyright 2016, American College of Chest Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
SESSION TITLE: Imaging
SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Poster
PRESENTED ON: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM
PURPOSE: Current guidelines have proposed criteria to diagnose a Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) pattern on a High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the chest and recommend that a definite UIP pattern on chest HRCT obviates the need of a biopsy. However, the criteria have not been prospectively validated. To our knowledge there has been no assessment of the agreement of a UIP pattern amongst chest radiologists. Our objective was to assess the agreement in the diagnosis of UIP between chest radiologists.
METHODS: Two Chest Radiologists at a tertiary academic center in Canada (Kingston General Hospital) reviewed 117 good quality chest CT scans of patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases to determine the presence of a UIP pattern. As per the guidelines, Chest Radiologists diagnosed: 1) definite UIP; 2) possible UIP or 3) inconsistent UIP pattern. In addition, we assessed the agreement between them in the presence of reticulation and honeycombing.
RESULTS: Agreement between chest radiologists in the diagnosis of definite UIP was 65% to 77%; for possible UIP was 31% to 60% and for inconsistent UIP pattern was 56% to 82% (Kappa 0.36; fair agreement). Agreement in the diagnosis of Reticulation was 50% to 96% (Kappa 0.65; substantial agreement) and in the diagnosis of Honeycombing was 71% to 91% (Kappa 0.64; substantial agreement. Agreement on the subpleural predominance of abnormalities was 46% to 94% (Kappa 0.04; slight agreement) and in the lower predominance of abnormalities was only 49% to 79% (Kappa 0.44; moderate agreement).
CONCLUSIONS: The agreement in the diagnosis of UIP by chest radiologists using the criteria proposed by current guidelines is unsatisfactory in the real clinical setting.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In clinical practice and using current guidelines, the diagnosis of a UIP pattern could vary considerably between chest radiologists. This could result in a significant variation on the number of patients “requiring” surgical biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of UIP.
DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Katarina Janic, Robert Nolan, Rob Dhillion, Justin Flood, Muhannad Hawari, Angel Moran
No Product/Research Disclosure Information
Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.
Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.
Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.
Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.
Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.
Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited:
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.