0
Original Research: Lung Cancer |

Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Lobectomies

Lise N. Tchouta, MD; Henry S. Park, MD, MPH; Daniel J. Boffa, MD; Justin D. Blasberg, MD; Frank C. Detterbeck, MD; Anthony W. Kim, MD
Author and Funding Information

FUNDING/SUPPORT: L. N. T. is the recipient of the Richard K. Gershon, M.D. research fellowship.

aSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

bDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

CORRESPONDENCE TO: Anthony W. Kim, MD, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, BB 205, New Haven, CT, 06520


Copyright 2016, American College of Chest Physicians. All Rights Reserved.


Chest. 2017;151(2):329-339. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.008
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background  The positive impact of hospital operative volume on outcomes following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has been established. The goal of this study was to determine whether or not this volume/outcome relationship translates to robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RobATS) lobectomy.

Methods  Patients who underwent RobATS lobectomy were identified between 2008 and 2013 in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database. Hospital volume, as well as demographic, clinical, and health-care system-related factors were selected as potential predictors of outcomes. Outcome variables included length of stay (LOS), inpatient mortality, and complications. Hospitals were designated by quartiles according to annual case volume, with very low-volume defined as the first quartile and high-volume defined as the fourth quartile. Regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of the outcomes of interest.

Results  A total of 8,253 RobATS lobectomies were identified. Compared with very low-volume centers, patients at high-volume hospitals had a shorter mean LOS (5.8 vs 6.5 days; P = .001) and decreased mortality rate (0.5% vs 1.9%; P < .001) but more complications (28.1% vs 27.6%; P = .025). In multivariable analysis, high hospital volume was prognostic for decreased mortality (OR, 0.134; P< .001) and shorter LOS (0.2 days; SE, 0.05; P<.001). Hospital volume was not prognostic for any complications, including pulmonary, cardiovascular, intraoperative, or infectious complications.

Conclusions  Undergoing lobectomy at high-volume RobATS centers confers favorable mortality and LOS outcomes compared with very low-volume centers. In this relatively early phase of adoption of RobATS, the long-term clinical impact of differences in LOS as well as the lack of clinical impact on the incidence of complications remain to be determined more definitively. However, the beneficial effect of volume on mortality suggests a need for the careful adoption of this promising technology.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543