0
Obstructive Lung Diseases: COPD I |

Environmental Factors on the Influence of Migratory Birds Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease FREE TO VIEW

Yan Peng; Lixin Xie, PhD
Author and Funding Information

Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China


Copyright 2016, American College of Chest Physicians. All Rights Reserved.


Chest. 2016;149(4_S):A377. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.392
Text Size: A A A
Published online

SESSION TITLE: COPD I

SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Poster

PRESENTED ON: Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 11:45 AM - 12:45 PM

PURPOSE: To explore the influences of environment factors on the migratory birds patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (MDCOPD).

METHODS: Among the 82 stable MDCOPD from Beijing area in analysis. At Sanya, from October to April the following year (represent wintertime), this study gave COPD assessment test (CAT) scores and medicine research council scale (mMRC) scores respectively, every 2 months follow-up was performed. From May to September (represent summertime), when the MDCOPD patients coming back to Beijing area, this study gave CAT scores and mMRC scores respectively again, every 2 months follow-up was performed. Comparison of the stable MDCOPDs scoring change after changed the living environment. During the follow up period, if the MDCOPDs with acute exacerbation or hospitalization, this study would record it and give the scores after they were coming to stable 1month. At the same time, in the national urban air quality publishing platform record daily air quality index (AQI), record the temperature and relative humidity in the weather network

RESULTS: The scores of CAT in Sanya was significantly lower than Beijing [(20.0±8.0) vs (26.4±7.1) scores, P=0.001]. The scores of mMRC in Sanya was significantly lower than Beijing [(1.9±0.8) vs (2.9±0.9) scores, P=0.001]; according to the latest guidelines, using mMRC evaluation of MDCOPD, its classification had D to C, the CAT scores did not cause the change of classification. Temperature had no obvious change in the wintertime and summertime [(23.1±4.2) vs (24.3±2.3) ℃, P=0.674]; the wintertime of AQI was significantly lower than the summertime of AQI [(49.4±8.9) vs (113.1±14.2) μg/m3, P<0.001]; the wintertime of relative humidity was significantly higher than the summertime of relative humidity [(90.6±4.9)% vs (58.0±10.0)%, P=0.001].

CONCLUSIONS: When the MDCOPDs are coming to the area where have a better air quality and higher relative humidity, it quality of life and activity tolerance can improved obviously.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: air quality and relative humidity affects the quality lift and activity tolerance of patients with COPD, improve air quality and increase humidity, the quality of life and realtive humidity can increased accordingly.

DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Yan Peng, Lixin Xie

No Product/Research Disclosure Information


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543