0
Miscellaneous |

Efficacy of Once-Daily Tiotropium and Olodaterol Maintenance Treatment for COPD: Patient-Reported Outcomes FREE TO VIEW

François Maltais, MD; Lars Groenke, MD; Lawrence Korducki, MS; Roland Buhl, MD
Author and Funding Information

Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada


Chest. 2015;148(4_MeetingAbstracts):638A. doi:10.1378/chest.2347832
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

SESSION TITLE: Late Breaking Abstracts

SESSION TYPE: Late Breaking Abstract Slide

PRESENTED ON: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 08:45 AM - 10:00 AM

PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly symptomatic and debilitating condition. The efficacy and safety of a new once-daily (QD) maintenance treatment of tiotropium (T), a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in combination with olodaterol (O), a long-acting β2-agonist, in moderate to severe COPD was demonstrated in the TONADO™ studies (NCT01431274; NCT01431287). Here we present new data on patient-reported health assessments from these trials.

METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 52-week, Phase III trials assessed T+O (2.5/5 μg; 5/5 μg; via Respimat® inhaler) QD compared to O 5 µg and T 2.5 or 5 µg. To ascertain whether improvements in lung function are associated with symptom reduction for patients, we present data from the combined analysis of the two studies for patient global rating (PGR) assessments, measured by scoring of their health status (related to their respiratory condition) from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse), from the TONADO™ trials after 52 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS: 5162 patients were randomized and treated. Significant decreases (i.e. improvements) in PGR health-status scores were observed with both doses of T+O compared to monocomponents at 52 weeks. The adjusted mean treatment difference was -0.217 for T+O 5/5 µg versus O 5 µg (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.315, -0.119; p<0.0001) and ‑0.197 versus T 5 µg (95% CI -0.295, -0.100; p<0.0001). Treatment differences were also significant for T+O 2.5/5 µg versus monocomponents. Treatment differences between T+O 2.5/5 µg and 5/5 µg were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the sustained improvements in lung function demonstrated in the TONADO™ studies, T+O provides long-term improvements in patient-reported health status.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These data demonstrate that appropriate maintenance therapy can improve not only lung function in patients with COPD, but also, as importantly, symptoms, and, therefore, quality of life. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim. Editorial assistance: Complete HealthVizion.

DISCLOSURE: François Maltais: Grant monies (from sources other than industry): Boeringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Nycomed, Pfizer, Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Other: Recipient of the CIHR/GSK Research Chair (GlaxoSmithKline) Lars Groenke: Employee: Boehringer Ingelheim Lawrence Korducki: Employee: Boehringer Ingelheim Roland Buhl: Grant monies (from sources other than industry): Support for Investigator Initiated Trials (IITs) from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Roche, Grant monies (from industry related sources): Grants from the German Research Foundation, Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: Reimbursement for attending scientific conferences,and/or fees for speaking and/or consulting from AstraZeneca,Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda

No Product/Research Disclosure Information


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543