0
Original Research: Pulmonary Procedures |

Patient Safety and Comparative Effectiveness of Anesthetic Technique in Open Lung ResectionsPatient Safety and Anesthesia Type in Lung Surgery

Umut Özbek, PhD; Jashvant Poeran, MD, PhD; Madhu Mazumdar, PhD; Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

From the Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science & Policy (Drs Özbek, Poeran, and Mazumdar), Tisch Cancer Institute (Drs Özbek and Mazumdar), and Department of Medicine (Dr Poeran), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Healthcare Policy and Research (Dr Memtsoudis), Weill Cornell Medical College, and Department of Anesthesiology (Dr Memtsoudis), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY; and Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine (Dr Memtsoudis), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

CORRESPONDENCE TO: Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD, FCCP, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021; e-mail: memtsoudiss@hss.edu


FUNDING/SUPPORT: Drs Özbek and Mazumdar were partially supported by Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians. See online for more details.


Chest. 2015;148(3):722-730. doi:10.1378/chest.14-3040
Text Size: A A A
Published online

BACKGROUND:  Despite literature suggesting benefits of using regional anesthesia, the impact of neuraxial anesthesia on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing lung surgery remains unstudied. We studied the effect of combined neuraxial/general anesthesia (vs general anesthesia) on perioperative outcome in a large national sample of patients who underwent open lung resection.

METHODS:  We extracted data from the Premier Perspective database on patients who underwent open lung resection. The main effect of interest was anesthesia type: general and combined neuraxial/general anesthesia. Patient and health-care variables, complications, and resource use were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses assessed the independent impact of choice of anesthetic technique on outcomes.

RESULTS:  For 18,943 patients, anesthesia type was known: 79% (n = 14,912) were administered general anesthesia, and 21% (n = 4,031) received neuraxial/general anesthesia. Comparing general vs neuraxial/general anesthesia, unadjusted incidences for the latter were lower for acute myocardial infarction (1.09% vs 0.67%, P = .018), pulmonary complications (20.96% vs 18.98%, P = .006), blood transfusion (14.15% vs 9.80%, P < .0001), and mechanical ventilation (11.60% vs 8.81%, P < .0001). Neuraxial/general anesthesia was associated with lower adjusted odds of blood transfusion (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98) and mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.81; 95% CI , 0.67-0.98), while higher odds were seen for DVT (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.01-2.23) and pulmonary embolism (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.02-2.38).

CONCLUSIONS:  This study illustrates the association between adding neuraxial to general anesthesia in open lung resections among patients with cancer and perioperative outcomes. Neuraxial anesthesia use was associated with decreased risk for blood transfusion but increased thromboembolic risks. Additional studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms by which neuraxial anesthesia may affect these outcomes.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543