Sleep Disorders |

Effectiveness of Home Single-Channel Nasal Pressure for Sleep Apnea Diagnosis FREE TO VIEW

Juan F. Masa, PhD; Joaquín Durán-Cantolla, PhD; Francisco Capote, PhD; Marta Cabello, MD; Jorge Abad, MD; Francisco Garcia-Rio, MD; Antoni Ferrer, PhD; Merche Mayos, MD; Nicolás Mangado, PhD; Mónica de la Peña, MD; Felipe Aizpuru, MD; Ferran Barbé, PhD; Jose M. Montserrat, PhD
Author and Funding Information

Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Cáceres, Spain

Chest. 2014;145(3_MeetingAbstracts):592A. doi:10.1378/chest.1776063
Text Size: A A A
Published online



SESSION TYPE: Poster Presentations

PRESENTED ON: Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 01:15 PM - 02:15 PM

PURPOSE: Home single-channel nasal pressure (HNP) may be an alternative to polysomnography (PSG) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis but no cost studies have been carried out. Automatic scoring is simpler but generally less effective than manual scoring. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic efficacy and cost of both scorings (automatic and manual) compared with PSG, taking as a polysomnographic OSA diagnosis a clinical-epidemiological apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cut-off point (≥5) and a clinical-therapeutic AHI cut-off point (≥15).

METHODS: We included suspected OSA patients in a multicenter study. They were randomized to home and hospital protocols. We constructed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for both scorings. Diagnostic efficacy was explored for several HNP AHI cut-off points and costs were calculated for equally effective alternatives.

RESULTS: Of 787 randomized patients, 752 underwent HNP. Manual scoring produced better ROC curves than automatic for AHI≥5 and similar for AHI≥15. A valid HNP would correctly classify the OSA presence (or otherwise) with manual scoring for a clinical-epidemiological diagnosis in 90% of patients and with automatic scoring for a clinical-therapeutic diagnosis in 60%. The costs of either HNP approach were 40%-70% lower than those of PSG. Manual HNP for clinical-epidemiological diagnosis had the lowest cost and manual and automatic scorings had similar costs for clinical-therapeutic diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS: HNP is a cheaper alternative than PSG for OSA diagnosis. Manual HNP scoring seems especially useful for epidemiological studies on a clinical population base, although manual or automatic scorings can achieve a suitable diagnosis for clinical-therapeutic management

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The use of a very simple automatic device favor the use for non-specialist practitioners for the management of patients with sleep apnea suspicion

DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Juan F. Masa, Joaquín Durán-Cantolla, Francisco Capote, Marta Cabello, Jorge Abad, Francisco Garcia-Rio, Antoni Ferrer, Merche Mayos, Nicolás Mangado, Mónica de la Peña, Felipe Aizpuru, Ferran Barbé, Jose M. Montserrat

No Product/Research Disclosure Information




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543