0
Education, Teaching, and Quality Improvement |

A Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Inappropriate Referrals to a Specialized Ventilation-Weaning Unit

Mazen Al-Qadi, MD; Sanjay Chaudhary, MD; Erin Frazee, PharmD; Vicki Loeslie, RN; Jon Steuernagle, MD; John Park, MD
Author and Funding Information

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN


Chest. 2013;144(4_MeetingAbstracts):538A. doi:10.1378/chest.1705011
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

SESSION TITLE: Cost and Quality Posters

SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Poster

PRESENTED ON: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 at 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM

PURPOSE: Our objective was to apply Lean Sigma, a quality improvement project to eliminate waste and improve efficiency of patient transfer to a specialized ventilation-weaning unit. The project goals were to decrease the number of inappropriate consults and streamline the transfer process.

METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the process of patient’s transfer to the Respiratory Care Unit (RCU). Requested consults placed during the months of November through December 2012 were measured and analyzed for appropriateness and outcome. The frequency of inappropriate RCU consults and most common barriers to smooth transfer to the RCU were recorded. An intervention was implemented which provided a brief outline of the RCU purpose and transfer criteria to consultants and charge nurses via email, as well as paper documentation for medical residents and fellows in the workroom and for the workstations on wheels.

RESULTS: Upon follow-up evaluation, RCU appropriateness increased from 76% to 82%. In all cases where the consults were inappropriate, contact was made with the primary service, which was an increase during the follow-up period by 22%. Future opportunities identified include expanded use of clinical notes to communicate RCU consult inappropriateness with primary service and integration of a computer-based intervention screen during RCU consult placement regarding criteria.

CONCLUSIONS: Use of Lean Sigma principles in a ventilation-weaning unit led to reduction in the inappropriate consults. Process mapping, improved education and communication among providers, and engagement of leadership and staff were key to improvement.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Respiratory Care Unit (RCU) is a specialized unit designed for patients who repeatedly failed weaning attempts from mechanical ventilators. RCU providers are under increasing pressure to see greater volumes of patients while maintaining high quality of care. Furthermore, long wait times are undesirable among referring physicians and can decrease their satisfaction. These factors highlight the great need to optimize the efficient use of the RCU providers’ time in evaluating patients referred to the RCU.

DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Mazen Al-Qadi, Sanjay Chaudhary, Erin Frazee, Vicki Loeslie, Jon Steuernagle, John Park

No Product/Research Disclosure Information


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543