0
Education, Teaching, and Quality Improvement |

The Use of Point of Care Ultrasound in the Medical Intensive Care Unit Reduces Healthcare Cost and Patient Radiation Exposure

Margarita Oks, MD; Rubin Cohen, MD; Seth Koenig, MD; Mangala Narasimhan, DO
Author and Funding Information

NSLIJ Health System, Manhasset, NY


Chest. 2013;144(4_MeetingAbstracts):542A. doi:10.1378/chest.1704776
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

SESSION TITLE: Improving Quality and Reducing Cost

SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Slide

PRESENTED ON: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 02:45 PM - 04:15 PM

PURPOSE: We propose that the use of point of care ultrasound in the MICU, in the hands of ultrasound trained physicians, can reduce cost by reducing the number of chest x rays and CT scans. This will reduce radiation exposure and cost. We also studied whether this reduction in radiological testing affected patient outcomes.

METHODS: Retrospective chart review comparing standard imaging xrays (chest), ct scans (head, chest, abdomen/pelvis), echocardiography, and ultrasound (dvt) between two independent, but similar medical intensive care units staffed by the same medical house staff and pulmonary/critical care fellows, in one health care system. One unit uses bedside sonography as standard of care with all physicians trained in appropriate techniques; the second uses conventional imaging as its standard of care in diagnosis/management. Three months of data, were collected and compared with results adjusted for number of patients. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used as an index of disease severity, and to assess mortality.

RESULTS: We looked at the number of chest xrays ordered per patient stay. In the ICU with limited ultrasound use (for line placement only) there were 5.21 xrays done per patient stay. In the ICU with routine ultrasound there were 1.10 xrays per patient stay. Total CT scans were 0.91 in the non-ultrasound ICU vs. 0.26 per patient stay in the unit that used ultrasound as standard of care. For cardiac echocardiograms in the non-ultrasound ICU there were 0.27 vs. 0.11 in the ultrasound ICU per patient stay. The mortality was 0.27 in the non-ultrasound ICU vs. 0.20 for the ultrasound ICU.

CONCLUSIONS: We found that the use of point of care ultrasound greatly reduces the number of radiological tests ordered without negatively affecting patient outcomes.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The routine use of point of care ultrasound in a MICU provides the benefits of reducing radiological testing that may have been otherwise ordered and may impact on cost and radiation exposure.

DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Margarita Oks, Rubin Cohen, Seth Koenig, Mangala Narasimhan

No Product/Research Disclosure Information


Sign In to Access Full Content

Want to access your Institution's subscription?
Sign in to your individual user account while you are actively authenticated on this website via your institution (Learn more about institutional authentication). We will then sustain your personal access to their content/subscription for 90 days, after which you can repeat this process.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Want to Purchase a Subscription?

New to CHEST? Become an ACCP member to receive a full subscription to both the print and online editions.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543