0
Obstructive Lung Diseases |

The Validity of BODE Index Modified by Replacement of the Six-Minute Walk Test With COPD Assessment Test

Francesca Gibellino, MD; Laura Mammana, MMSc; Nicola Ciancio, MD; Giuseppe Di Maria, MD
Author and Funding Information

Respiratory Diseases Unit "Cannizzaro" Hospital, Catania, Italy


Chest. 2013;144(4_MeetingAbstracts):721A. doi:10.1378/chest.1701887
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

SESSION TITLE: COPD Severity Metrics

SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Slide

PRESENTED ON: Sunday, October 27, 2013 at 03:00 PM - 04:00 PM

PURPOSE: Both the BODE index and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), incorporating items which are strongly related to exercise capacity, provide reliable measurements of health status in COPD patients also capturing the beneficial effects induced by pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of BODE modified by replacing the 6-min walk test (6MWT) with CAT (BOD-CAT), and the sensitivity and responsiveness of the modified index to pulmonary rehabilitation.

METHODS: Ninety-two patients with mild to severe COPD (53M and 39F; age 45-83 years) were studied. FEV1, BMI, MMRC scale, 6MWT and CAT were evaluated. Two BODE index scores were then completed: one with 6MWT and one with CAT score. In addition, 36 patients were evaluated after a six weeks pulmonary rehabilitation program.

RESULTS: Pearson correlation between 6MWT and CAT score was significant (r=-0.28; p<0.05) just as BODE and BOD-CAT (r=0,88; p<0.001). The BOD-CAT distribution overestimated the BODE by 1.5 points. The analysis of covariance of BOD-CAT score related to GOLD stages showed a significant difference (p<0.001). FEV1, 6MWT, MMRC, BODE, CAT and BOD-CAT before and after pulmonary rehabilitation were also significantly different. The size of mean change for BODE, CAT and BOD-CAT scores achieved the minimally clinically important difference only in severe COPD patients. No significant difference between the distributions of changes of BODE and BOD-CAT scores before and after rehabilitation was found.

CONCLUSIONS: The excellent correlation between the original BODE, the CAT and the BOD-CAT enables us to conclude: the CAT is a valid substitute of 6MWT; the BOD-CAT is as effective as the BODE, and it can be used as a reliable, and discriminative measurement of health status in COPD patients.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The BOD-CAT is easy to use in routine clinical practice, and is responsive to change in health status after pulmonary rehabilitation.

DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Francesca Gibellino, Laura Mammana, Nicola Ciancio, Giuseppe Di Maria

No Product/Research Disclosure Information


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543