Tobacco Cessation and Prevention |

Urinary Nicotine and Cotinine as a Method for Assessing the Effectiveness of an Intervention to Aid Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy FREE TO VIEW

Andriani Loukopoulou, RN; Constantine Vardavas, MD; Manolis Tzatzarakis, PhD; George Farmakides, MD; Christos Rossolymos, MD; Charalambos Chrelias, MD; Aristidis Tsatsakis, PhD; Gregory Connolly, DMD; Panagiotis Behrakis*, MD
Author and Funding Information

Smoking and Lung Cancer Research Center, Hellenic Cancer Society, Athens, Greece

Chest. 2012;142(4_MeetingAbstracts):1081A. doi:10.1378/chest.1390281
Text Size: A A A
Published online


SESSION TYPE: Tobacco Cessation and Prevention

PRESENTED ON: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 at 04:30 PM - 05:45 PM

PURPOSE: Smoking cessation during pregnancy has been shown to be beneficial to both the child and mother. Within the context of randomized controlled trials, using a biomarker to assess success or failure may help avoid misclassification do to misreporting by the participant. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using urinary nicotine and cotinine as an indicator of smoking cessation during pregnancy within the context of a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS: The M-SCOPE study is a 2 group parallel randomized control trial (RCT) among pregnant smokers in Greece (n=84) that were randomly assigned to an intervention for smoking cessation or a control group. The control group/low intensity intervention included: brief advice for 5 minutes and a short leaflet, while the experimental group/intensive intervention included: 30 minutes of individualized cognitive-behavioral intervention and a self-help manual for smoking cessation during pregnancy. Urine samples for biomarker analysis of cotinine and nicotine were collected at two time points: at baseline and around the 32nd week of gestation and analyzed for their nicotine/cotinine content using LC/MS.

RESULTS: Within the context of our study, urinary nicotine was found to decrease by 190 ng/ml in the intervention group (from 443 to 253 ng/ml, p=0.05), while urinary cotinine by 140 ng/ml (from 452 to 312 ng/ml, p=0.016) among intervention group participants. On the contrary, among control group participants urinary nicotine and cotinine concentrations were not found to decrease (cotinine: from 561 to 737 ng/ml, p=0.551 and nicotine: 891 to 1040 ng/ml, p=0.423). Comparing the two metabolites (nicotine vs. cotinine), the latter was found to be associated statistically stronger with smoking cessation.

CONCLUSIONS: Urinary nicotine and cotinine were successful indicators of smoking cessation during pregnancy, and were found to decrease among participants after smoking cessation, with the latter found to be a statistically stronger marker.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Urinary cotinine was identified as a better marker of smoking cessation indicating its usefulness as a method of validating smoking cessation within randomized controlled trials.

DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Andriani Loukopoulou, Constantine Vardavas, Manolis Tzatzarakis, George Farmakides, Christos Rossolymos, Charalambos Chrelias, Aristidis Tsatsakis, Gregory Connolly, Panagiotis Behrakis

No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Smoking and Lung Cancer Research Center, Hellenic Cancer Society, Athens, Greece




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543