0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

IS DIABETES A STRONGER PREDICTOR OF RECURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS THAN THE ANGIOGRAPHIC SEVERITY OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE? FREE TO VIEW

Julio A. Chirinos, MD*; Eduardo De Marchena, MD; Anila Veerani, MD; Arley Peter, MD; Nasser Khan, MD; Alan Schob, MD; Alex Ferreira, MD; Simon Chakko, MD
Author and Funding Information

University of Miami, Miami, FL



Chest. 2006;130(4_MeetingAbstracts):198S. doi:10.1378/chest.130.4_MeetingAbstracts.198S-c
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: Both the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) predict recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The purpose of our study was to examine the correlation between DM, coronary angiographic findings and the risk of MACE among patients with established CAD.

METHODS: We prospectively followed 347 males with CAD undergoing coronary angiography for 4 years. The combined endpoint was the occurence of MACE, including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, coronary revascularization and death. We used logistic regression and calculated odds ratios (OR) and the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AU-ROC)for each logistic regression model to directly compare their predictive ability.

RESULTS: Univariate predictors of MACE included DM (OR=2.36;95%CI=1.49-3.74;p<0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR per 10% increase=0.77;95%CI=0.66-0.90;p=0.001), congestive heart failure (OR=2.33;95%CI=1.30-4.17;p=0.004), peripheral vascular disease (OR=2.10;95%CI=1.23-3.57;p=0.006) and serum creatinine (OR per mg/dL increase=1.32;95%CI=1.02-1.71;p=0.03). DM was the strongest predictor of MACE (AU-ROC=0.60). The number of coronary territories involved with hemodynamically significant CAD tended to predict MACE (OR per vessel involved=1.24;95%CI=0.99-1.55;p=0.05). DM remained the strongest predictor of MACE in multivariate models. The best model constructed with multiple angiography-related variables (number of vessels with significant CAD, history of previous CABG, need for CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention from findings during index angiography, and presence left main stenosis) had an AU-ROC of 0.58. This was inferior to the AU-ROC for the model containing DM alone (0.60).

CONCLUSION: DM is a stronger predictor of recurrent MACE than the angiographic severity of CAD. DM is associated with continuous exposure to a pro-atherogenic milieu and extracardiac atherosclerotic disease, explaining its strong ability to predict cardiovascular events beyond the angiographic presence or severity of CAD.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: DM a much stronger risk factor for future cardiovascular events than coronary angiographic findings at any given time. Diabetics should be regarded as high-risk patients even when the coronary angiogram is normal or reveals mild abnormalities.

DISCLOSURE: Julio Chirinos, None.

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543