0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

UTILITY OF PORTABLE CHEST RADIOGRAPH MEASUREMENTS IN DIFFERENTIATING CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE FROM OTHER CAUSES OF DYSPNEA IN PATIENTS PRESENTING TO EMERGENCY ROOM FREE TO VIEW

Jair Munoz Mendoza, MD*; Adam Guttentag, MD; Matthew Krasner, MD; Ivan Mendoza, MD; Sherry C. Pomerantz, PhD; Glenn Eiger, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA



Chest. 2006;130(4_MeetingAbstracts):195S. doi:10.1378/chest.130.4_MeetingAbstracts.195S-c
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if vascular pedicle width (VPW), vascular pedicle ratio (VPR), or cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on portable chest radiographs (CXR), accurately differentiate congestive heart failure (CHF) from others causes of dyspnea, and if any of these measurements have any additive value to serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels.

METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CXRs and obtained measurements of VPW, VPR and CTR. VPR was calculated by dividing VPW by the diameter of the thorax. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were computed from logistic regression models.

RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were analyzed. The mean age was 68.5 (SD 13.2), 65.5% were women and 84.6% were African-American. 57.7% had the diagnosis of CHF. VPW and VPR could not distinguish patients with CHF from patients with other causes of dyspnea (p=0.37 and 0.128 respectively). CTR alone was a good method of distinguishing patients with CHF from patients with other causes of dyspnea (AUC=78%, 95%CI, 67% to 90%, p<0.001). LogBNP predicted CHF with AUC=90% (p<0.001). When logBNP and CTR were analyzed together, CTR did not add any statistically significant predictive accuracy to a model using BNP (p=0.07).

CONCLUSION: VPW and VPR do not appear to differentiate CHF from other causes of dyspnea in this study group. CTR is a good independent predictor of CHF. CTR does not add any statistically significant predictive value to BNP measurement.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CXR measurements are readily available, inexpensive, and non-invasive. While VPW and VPR cannot be relied upon to differentiate the causes of dyspnea in patients presenting to the emergency room, CTR may provide useful diagnostic information.

DISCLOSURE: Jair Munoz Mendoza, None.

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543