0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE PRACTICES AMONG ADULTS WITH ASTHMA AND RHINITIS: RELATION TO PHYSICAL HEALTH STATUS IN PROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP FREE TO VIEW

Paul D. Blanc, MD, FCCP*; Hubert Chen, MD, MPH; Patricia P. Katz, PhD; Edward H. Yelin, PhD; Irene H. Yen, PhD; Umesh Masharani, MD; Laura Trupin, MPH; Mark D. Eisner, MD, MPH
Author and Funding Information

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA



Chest. 2006;130(4_MeetingAbstracts):164S-c-165S. doi:10.1378/chest.130.4_MeetingAbstracts.164S-c
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is believed to be common in airway disease, but determinants of CAM practices have been understudied.

METHODS: We used data from 2 interviews conducted 2 years apart to assess CAM practices among adults with asthma and/or rhinitis. Baseline data were obtained from 416 adults, of whom 375 (90%) were re-interviewed at follow-up. Airway disease diagnoses among the 375 were: asthma without rhinitis, 55 (15%); asthma with rhinitis, 264 (70%); rhinitis alone, 56 (15%). We analyzed the prospective association between physical health status (SF-12 Physical Component Scale [PCS]) and CAM practices used for breathing or nasal symptoms over the past 12 months.

RESULTS: Frequencies of oral CAM use were: vitamins/minerals, 30%; herbals, 21%; black coffee/tea, 18%; other caffeine self-treatment, 13%; dietary supplements such as garlic or chili pepper, 14%; homeopathy, 8%. In total, 189 individuals (50%; 95% CI 45-55%) used one of the 6 oral CAMs; 86 subjects (23%) used 1 only; 103 (27%) reported 2 or more, including 27 (7%) reporting 4-6 practices. We also studied the use of 6 other CAM therapies (acupuncture, meditation, aroma therapy, massage, chiropractic therapy, yoga). Seventy-four subjects (20%; 95% CI 16-24%) reported such therapies, 59 (80%) of whom also used oral CAMs. In multiple logistic regression, physical health at baseline (mean PCS=45.6±11) was prospectively associated with oral CAM use. Those with poorer health (lower PCS) were more likely to report use of ≥1 oral CAM (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.02-1.5] per 10-point PCS increment; p=0.03). In the same model, airway disease diagnosis was not a significant predictor of oral CAM use. The relationship to PCS was similar for the other CAM therapies (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0-1.6; p=0.05).

CONCLUSION: CAM practices are common, inter-related, and are predicted by self-assessed physical health status.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Taking physical health into account, such practices do not differ among those with asthma, rhinitis, or both conditions.

DISCLOSURE: Paul Blanc, None.

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543