Abstract: Slide Presentations |


John N. Afthinos, MD*; Charles Y. Ro, MD; Cliff P. Connery, MD; Karen M. McGinnis, MD; Christopher W. Adams, MD; Maureen Reyes, Other; R. J. A. Nabong, Other; Joseph J. DeRose, Jr., MD; Robert C. Ashton, Jr., MD
Author and Funding Information

St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY


Chest. 2005;128(4_MeetingAbstracts):145S. doi:10.1378/chest.128.4_MeetingAbstracts.145S
Text Size: A A A
Published online


PURPOSE:  Mediastinal masses can be approached through a variety of surgical techniques, including sternotomy, thoracotomy, and thoracoscopy, depending on indication, location, and extent of disease. Our experience reflects the current advances in surgical techniques for diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal masses.

METHODS:  A retrospective comparative study of the surgical approaches to anterior and posterior mediastinal mass resection was performed using our thoracic surgery database for patients treated between January 2002 and December 2004. Forty patients presented with anterior pathology (25 sternotomy, 3 thoracotomy, 9 robotic thoracoscopy, and 3 video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS)). Eleven patients had posterior pathology (3 thoracotomy, 1 sternotomy, 1 transcervical approach, and 6 VATS). Data was analyzed with Mann-Whitney U-test, Student’s T-test, and Chi-square.

RESULTS:  Tissue of thymic origin (including thymoma, hyperplasia, and cysts) represented 80% (32/40) of anterior pathology. Schwannomas and neurofibromas represented 45% (5/11) and 27% (3/11), respectively, of posterior pathology. Patients who underwent minimally invasive approaches (VATS and robotic-assisted) for anterior mediastinal masses had shorter length of chest tube days and length of hospital stay (p=0.016 & p=0.002, respectively). Similarly, patients who underwent VATS for posterior mediastinal masses had shorter operative times, length of chest tube days, and length of hospital stay but no statistical significance was achieved. No significant difference in other patient demographics or immediate post-op and 30-day mortality was noted in either anterior or posterior groups.

CONCLUSION:  Minimally invasive approaches offer advantages compared to traditional open resection in selected cases. A decision analysis for patients presenting with mediastinal masses needs to be made on an individual basis and is dependent upon, size of the mediastinal mass, body habitus, co-morbidities, and surgeon comfort with the approach.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  Thoracic surgeons should be familiar with all surgical techniques especially thoracoscopic and robotic approaches for the management of mediastinal disease. Anterior Mediastinal MassesPosterior Mediastinal MassesOPEN N=28VATS/ROBOT N=12pOPEN N=5VATS N=6p# Pack-years10.50.920.1013.06.7NSOR time (min)186165NS245205NSChest tube (days) (days)

DISCLOSURE:  John Afthinos, None.

Monday, October 31, 2005

10:30 AM - 12:00 PM




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543