0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

CURRENT PRACTICE OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHY IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS IN THE NETHERLANDS: A POSTAL SURVEY FREE TO VIEW

Marleen E. Graat; Peter E. Spronk, PhD; Marcus J. Schultz, PhD*
Author and Funding Information

Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands


Chest


Chest. 2005;128(4_MeetingAbstracts):296S. doi:10.1378/chest.128.4_MeetingAbstracts.296S
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE:  Although the consensus opinion of the American College of Radiology is that daily routine chest radiographs (routine CXRs) are indicated in all ventilated patients (http://www.acr.org), studies suggest that routine CXRs can be safely abandoned (Krivopal, Chest 2004; Price, CCM 2000).

METHODS:  To ascertain current practice of CXRs in Dutch ICU-patients, a questionnaire was sent to ICUs throughout the Netherlands. Questionnaires were sent to the lead clinicians of ICUs with > 5 beds.

RESULTS:  From the number of units responding (n = 28, 43.1%), the majority (n = 17, 60.7%) practiced a routine CXR-strategy, as opposed to a CXR on indication-approach. In most ICUs it was deemed necessary to have (routine) CXRs to ordeal on the presence or absence of ARDS, pneumonia or pneumothorax (n = 20; 71.4%, n = 19; 67.9% and n = 21; 75.0%, respectively), as well as the position of invasive devices (n = 21; 75.0%). In most hospitals a daily meeting with the radiologist was held to discuss CXRs (n = 19; 67.9%), but in more than half of hospitals the ICU-physician thought that radiologists were not experienced enough to adequately judge CXR of critically ill patients (n = 16; 57.1%). If a CXR was judged to be indicated, the reasons were in the majority of ICUs: introduction of invasive devices, such as endotracheal tubes, intravenous lines and thoracic drains (n = 22; 78.6%, n = 21; 75.0% and n = 27; 96.4%, respectively), and hemodynamic/ventilatory deterioration (n = 14; 50.0%); surprisingly, CXRs were also performed after resuscitation (n = 12; 42.9%) and (mini)-tracheotomy (n = 18; 64.3%). Finally, most ICU-physician thought that CXRs, either routine or on demand, influenced daily practice in not more than 20% of performed CXRs.

CONCLUSION:  In the Netherlands, the majority of ICUs still use routine CXRs, although this survey suggests that a large number of intensivists is doubting its value.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  There is important lack of concensus on usefulness of routine CXRs in the Netherlands.

DISCLOSURE:  Marcus Schultz, None.

Wednesday, November 2, 2005

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543