0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: IS IT SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY IMPLANTATION OF A DEFIBRILLATOR? FREE TO VIEW

Patrizio Pascale, MD*; Patrick Taffe, PhD; Claude Regamey, MD; Lukas Kappenberger, MD; Martin Fromer, MD
Author and Funding Information

University Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne, Switzerland


Chest


Chest. 2005;128(4_MeetingAbstracts):276S. doi:10.1378/chest.128.4_MeetingAbstracts.276S
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE:  Improved survival after prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) after myocardial infarction (MI) has been demonstrated in patients with remote MI experienced in the 1990’s. The absolute survival benefit conferred by this recommended strategy must be related to the current risk of arrhythmic death which is evolving. This study evaluates the mortality rate in survivors of MI with impaired left ventricular function and its relation to pre-discharge baseline characteristics.

METHODS:  Clinical records of patients who had sustained acute MI from 1999 to 2000 and were discharged with an EF ≤ 0·40 were included. Baseline characteristics, drug prescriptions and invasive procedures were recorded. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a primary endpoint of total mortality.

RESULTS:  165 patients were included. During a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range 22-36) 18 patients died. One and two-year mortality rates were 6·7% and 8·6%, respectively. Variables reflecting coronary artery disease and its management (prior MI, acute reperfusion, complete revascularization) had a greater impact on mortality than variables reflecting mechanical dysfunction (EF, Killip class).

CONCLUSION:  Mortality in survivors of MI with reduced EF is substantially lower than reported in the 1990’s.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  This decreased absolute mortality implies a proportional increase in the number of patients needed to treat with a prophylactic defibrillator. The risk of event may even be sufficiently low to limit the detectable benefit of defibrillators in patients with the prognostic features identified in our study. This argues for additional risk stratification prior to the prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator.

Multivariate analysis of the associations between selected variables and all-cause mortality

All-cause deathHazard ratio (95% CI)p ValueAge1·067 (0·997-1·142)0·059Male sex2·076 (0·652-6·610)0·216Left ventricular EF1·020 (0·939-1·108)0·634Previous MI3·632 (1·356-9·728)0·010Acute reperfusion0·267 (0·072-0·992)0·049Documented complete revascularization (acute or not)0·279 (0·074-1·050)0·059

DISCLOSURE:  Patrizio Pascale, None.

Wednesday, November 2, 2005

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543