0
Original Research: OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL LUNG DISEASES |

Airway Inflammatory Responses Following Exposure to Occupational AgentsAirway Responses to Occupational Agents

Philippe Prince, MSc; Catherine Lemière, MD; Marie-Hélène Dufour, MD; Simone Chaboillez, RT; Louis-Philippe Boulet, MD
Author and Funding Information

From the Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (Mr Prince and Drs Dufour and Boulet), Quebec City; and Service de pneumologie (Dr Lemière and Ms Chaboillez), Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Correspondence to: Louis-Philippe Boulet, MD, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec, QC, G1V 4G5, Canada; e-mail: lpboulet@med.ulaval.ca


Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians. See online for more details.

Funding/Support: The authors have reported to CHEST that no funding was received for this study.


© 2012 American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 2012;141(6):1522-1527. doi:10.1378/chest.11-1134
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  Airway inflammatory responses to specific inhalation challenges (SICs) with low-molecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) agents have not been studied thoroughly. We assessed the changes in airway inflammatory cells following SIC in sensitized workers, and looked at the influence of various factors on the pattern of inflammatory responses to SIC.

Methods:  Induced sputum analysis was performed in workers sensitized to LMW (n = 41) or HMW agents (n = 41) after a control day and after a positive SIC. Cell counts were compared with lung function and various clinical parameters.

Results:  In the LMW group, eosinophils were increased following late asthmatic responses (median [interquartile range], 0.02 [0.04] × 106 cells/g vs 0.30 [0.80] × 106 cells/g and 1.0% [3.5] vs 8.9% [8.0], P < .05), as were neutrophil numbers (0.8 [1.3] × 106 cells/g vs 2.3 [5.4] × 106 cells/g, P = .04). In the HMW group, eosinophil percentages increased both after early (1.0% [2.2] vs 5.5% [14.5], P = .003) and dual asthmatic responses (4.5% [3.7] vs 15.0% [13.7], P = .02). In the LMW group, the increases in neutrophils were higher in current smokers than in ex-smokers or nonsmokers. The length of exposure to the agent, tobacco use, and baseline percentage of eosinophils were independent predictors of the change in eosinophils, whereas age and baseline neutrophil percentage were predictors of the change in neutrophils.

Conclusions:  This study confirms that eosinophils and neutrophils are increased after SIC, whatever the causal agent. The type of agent is not predictive of the inflammatory response to SIC. Smoking is associated with a more neutrophilic response after SIC with an LMW agent.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543