0
Abstract: Slide Presentations |

NOCTURNAL INTENSIVISTS: ARE WE NEEDED? FREE TO VIEW

Francis M. Maguire, DO*; Svetolik Djurkovic, MD; Chuan L. Miao, MD; Marilyn T. Haupt, MD
Author and Funding Information

Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA


Chest


Chest. 2009;136(4_MeetingAbstracts):58S. doi:10.1378/chest.136.4_MeetingAbstracts.58S-e
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE:  We sought to determine whether there is a mortality difference when comparing patients admitted to the intensive care unit after-hours under direct care of board-certified intensive care physicians compared to other critical care providers (ie. non-intensivist physician providers, physician assistants, and moonlighting residents) with available supervision. Other critical care providers have after-hour supervision by board-certified intensivists available via the phone consistent with recommendations from the Leapfrog Group.

METHODS:  We performed a retrospective study of all patients admitted consecutively to our intensive care unit (ICU) after-hours initially to either an intensivist or other critical care provider. Based on pre-existing after-hours staffing patterns within our ICU we were able to compare data between our two defined provider groups. Pre-determined sample size was calculated in order to achieve a statistical power of 80%. In-hospital mortality, ICU mortality, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, and overall mortality were examined. Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for severity of disease.

RESULTS:  A total of 1542 patients were analyzed over a forty month time frame. There was no statistical difference between critical care physicians and other critical care providers in regards to hospital mortality (23.8% vs 22.6 %; p 0.64), ICU mortality (20.5% vs 17.1%; p 0.23), and ICU length of stay (162.4h vs 170.8h, p 0.75). APACHE II scores were not statistically different (18.98 vs 18.56; p 0.40).

CONCLUSION:  There is no difference in mortality or length of stay in a broad range of critically ill patients admitted to a tertiary care center ICU after-hours regardless of initial care provided via an intensivist or highly skilled supportive provider under supervision of a critical care intensivist.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  Our study cannot fully support recommendations regarding continuous after-hours in-house ICU physician staffing by intensivists. It does support a system based approach to ICU patient care with available intensivists as recommended by the Leapfrog Group. Future randomized controlled trials with a similar comparison and broader scale should be considered.

DISCLOSURE:  Francis Maguire, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

10:30 AM - 12:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543