0
Abstract: Slide Presentations |

IMPACT OF DURATION OF THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS ON THE OUTCOMES IN TOTAL HIP/KNEE REPLACEMENT (THR/TKR) SURGERY FREE TO VIEW

Wells Philip, MD*; Bijan Borah, PhD; Nishan Sengupta, PhD; Dylan Supina, PhD; Heather McDonald, MSc; Louis Kwong, MD
Author and Funding Information

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada


Chest


Chest. 2009;136(4_MeetingAbstracts):19S. doi:10.1378/chest.136.4_MeetingAbstracts.19S-g
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE:  Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in US patients undergoing total hip, or total knee replacement (THR/TKR) surgery. We evaluated the impact of duration of thromboprophylaxis on VTE and bleeding events in patients after THR/TKR surgery.

METHODS:  This retrospective study was based on claims data from a large US health plan database linked to an inpatient database. Patients aged ≥18 years, underwent THR/TKR surgeries between 04/01/2004 and 12/31/2006, and had thromboprophylaxis with an ACCP-recommended agent for ≥1 day post-surgery. Patients with evidence of VTE, or who underwent orthopaedic surgery 90 days prior to THR/TKR surgery were excluded. Outcomes included VTE, DVT, PE, and major and minor bleeding events. Bivariate comparisons between short-duration (≤14 days) and extended-duration (≥15 days) outcomes were based on chi-squared tests. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of short-duration vs extended-duration thromboprophylaxis on outcomes; adjustments were made for age, geographic region, baseline comorbidity score, as well as THR/TKR surgery, duration of thromboprophylaxis, and oral vs injectable prophylactic agent.

RESULTS:  Of 3,195 qualified patients (THR (1123), TKR (2072)), 67% received short-duration, while 33% received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis. Based on unadjusted analysis by surgery type (Table 1), patients who were given short-duration thromboprophylaxis vs extended-duration thromboprophylaxis had more VTE events; benefits were statistically significant in the TKR group. In combined group, patients with shorter-duration prophylaxis were approximately 3 (3.96% vs 1.43%; p<0.0001), 2 (2.84% vs 1.24%; p<0.0001), 6 (1.12% vs 0.19%; p=0.0052) and 4 (1.68% vs 0.38%; p=0.0011) times more likely to experience a VTE, DVT, PE, or major bleeding event, respectively. The risk-adjusted results are similar (Table 2).

CONCLUSION:  Approximately two out of three patients who underwent THR/TKR surgery received thromboprophylaxis for ≤14 days. These patients had significantly higher rates of VTE, DVT, PE, and major bleeding than patients who received prophylaxis for ≥15 days.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  The presented data suggest that extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing THR/TKR surgery is clinically beneficial.

DISCLOSURE:  Wells Philip, Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc. Johnson & Johnson; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Monday, November 2, 2009

2:30 PM - 3:30 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543