0
Abstract: Slide Presentations |

PREDICTIVE VALUES OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHS IN THE DETECTION OF PARENCHYMAL AND PLEURAL ABNORMALITIES AS COMPARED TO SCREENING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: RESULTS IN 6,220 POTENTIALLY ASBESTOS EXPOSED NUCLEAR FUEL WORKERS FREE TO VIEW

Albert Miller, MD*; Lyndon Rose, MD; Jeffrey A. Miller, MD; Steven Markowitz, MD
Author and Funding Information

Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Queens College, City University of NY, Flushing, NY


Chest


Chest. 2008;134(4_MeetingAbstracts):s5001. doi:10.1378/chest.134.4_MeetingAbstracts.s5001
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE:The chest radiograph (CXR) is used for evaluation of asbestos-related disease (ARD). Computed tomography (CT) is more accurate for asbestosis and pleural thickening (PT) in established disease. A principal role of radiographic imaging is screening, for which low dose (LD) CT is suited. There are no comparisons of CXR with LDCT for ARD. We assessed: (1) whether LDCT confirms interstitial fibrosis (IF) and PT and (2) detects cases not recognized on CXR.

METHODS:6220 nuclear workers had CXR for ARD and LDCT for lung cancer. Each CXR was read by a “B” reader. Each LDCT was read by a thoracic radiologist specifying IF and PT. The positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of CXR were calculated.

RESULTS:Of 96 subjects with IF by CXR, 24 had IF by LDCT (PPV 25%). Of 319 subjects with PT by CXR, 127 had PT detected by LDCT (PPV 40%). 130 additional subjects (2% of workforce) had IF and 188 (4%) had PT detected by CT alone.

CONCLUSION:LDCT confirmed IF in 25%. Most cases read by CXR (87/96) were low profusion (scores 1/0–1/2). CXR score correlated with CT. CT revealed IF in 2% with negative CXR, 10% with equivocal CXR (0/1, 1/0), 29% with less severe IF (1/1, 1/2) and 77% with severe IF (≥ 2/1). The majority of cases nowadays are equivocal or less severe in which the CXR is often not confirmed. Additionally, CT detected IF in 111 cases not detected by CXR (0/0). CT confirmed PT in 40% of cases read by CXR and detected PT in 188 cases (4%) not read on CXR.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:Most cases of asbestosis are low profusion, in which the CXR was often not confirmed by LDCT. 60% of CXR readings of PT were not confirmed by LDCT. The CXR demonstrated a high NPV for PT (96%) and especially for IF (98%). Nevertheless, the majority of cases were detected by CT alone.

DISCLOSURE:Albert Miller, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Monday, October 27, 2008

10:30 AM - 12:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
Idiopathic Pleuroparenchymal Fibroelastosis*: Description of a Novel Clinicopathologic Entity
PubMed Articles
Guidelines
Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.
Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543