0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

DEVELOPMENT OF QUALITY INDICATORS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PARAPNEUMONIC EFFUSIONS IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA FREE TO VIEW

Ervin H. Anaya, MD*; Bogdan Moldoveanu, MD; Juan Guardiola, MD; Bryan K. Moffet, MD; Julio A. Ramirez, MD; CAPO Investigators
Author and Funding Information

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Disorders, Louisville, KY


Chest


Chest. 2008;134(4_MeetingAbstracts):p58001. doi:10.1378/chest.134.4_MeetingAbstracts.p58001
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: Appropriate and timely management of a parapneumonic effusion (PPE) is important. The aim of this study was to develop a set of applicable quality indicators (QI) to assess the evaluation and management of PPE in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of 7 infectious diseases and pulmonary specialists from the University of Louisville completed the following three-step process: 1) developed flowcharts illustrating clinical pathways in the evaluation and management of PPE; 2) developed process-of-care quality indicators (QI); 3) developed outcome-based quality indicators. Finally, the flowcharts and QIs were tested in a sample of patients.

RESULTS: Four QIs were selected. QI 1: Timely evaluation of pleural space anatomy (EPSA) performed within 48 hours of admission (by either postero-anterior & lateral chest radiograph, lateral decubitus chest film, or CT of the chest). QI 2: Timely diagnostic thoracentesis performed within 24 hours of indication. QI 3: Timely therapeutic drainage of pleural effusion performed within 48 hours of indication (by either serial thoracentesis, small bore catheter, full-size chest tube, VATS or thoracotomy). QI 4: Successful resolution of PPE at 30 day followup. Failure was defined as: a) no change or an increase in size of effusion, b) need for re-drainage, c) or evidence of peel formation.

CONCLUSION: A systematic approach was used to develop a set of QIs to assess physicians' evaluation and management of PPE. Our initial experience at the University of Louisville suggests that these locally developed QIs can be helpful in the evaluation and management of hospitalized patients with CAP and PPE.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Further studies using these QIs may improve the quality of care provided to hospitalized patients with CAP and PPE.

DISCLOSURE: Ervin Anaya, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

1:00 PM - 2:15 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543