0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

THE SITE OF AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION AMONG PATIENTS OF BRONCHIAL ASTHMA: ROLE OF IMPULSE OSCILLOMETRY FREE TO VIEW

Harmanjit S. Hira, DM*; Anshu Singh, MD
Author and Funding Information

Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India


Chest


Chest. 2008;134(4_MeetingAbstracts):p5004. doi:10.1378/chest.134.4_MeetingAbstracts.p5004
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: To detect the site of airway obstruction among patients of asthma by impulse oscillometry (IOS) and to compare its observations with those of flow volume loop (FV Loop).

METHODS: Twenty-five patients of asthma were subjected to both impulse oscillometry (IOS) and conventional spirometry including flow volume loop. The resulting impedance spectra by IOS and findings of FV loop were utilized to identify the site of airway obstruction in each of patients. The both methods applied were also compared for sensitivity to identify obstruction and localise its site.

RESULTS: Two patients were excluded from the final analysis as their impedance spectra of IOS showed significant upper airway influence which would have made the localization of the site of airway obstruction invalid. Among remaining of 23 patients, IOS could detect airway obstruction in all of them (P<0.05), while FV loop revealed obstruction in 18 (78.2%) patients only. Furthermore FV loop localized the site of obstruction (combined central and peripheral airways) in 12 patients (52.2%); and the peripheral airway obstruction in 6 (26.1%) patients only. However, IOS revealed predominant central airway obstruction in 15 patients (65.5%) and predominant peripheral airway obstruction in 8 patients (34.5%).

CONCLUSION: The site of airway obstruction varied from central to peripheral (mainly central) in patients of asthma. IOS has proven to be an advantageous over FV loop studies as it could identify central and peripheral airway obstruction separately and established the predominant site of obstruction. Furthermore it could detect airway obstruction among those patients where FV loop studies were completely normal.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Both techniques IOS and FV Loop had their own characteristics and limitations. Both provided results by their own typical characteristics, information about mechanical behavior and properties of respiratory system. Impulse oscillometry was more sensitive in detecting airway obstruction and its site. In addition, IOS offers certain advantages over spirometry as it is effort independent, consumes less time and requires minimal patient's cooperation.

DISCLOSURE: Harmanjit Hira, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

1:00 PM - 2:15 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543