0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

ESTIMATION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURE USING TISSUE DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE E/EA FREE TO VIEW

Cristian Mornos, MD*; Adina Ionac, PhD; Dragos Cozma, PhD; Dana Maximov, MD; Laura Simion, MD; Stefan I. Dragulescu, PhD, MD
Author and Funding Information

Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Timisoara, Romania


Chest


Chest. 2007;132(4_MeetingAbstracts):578b. doi:10.1378/chest.132.4_MeetingAbstracts.578b
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: Peak early diastolic transmitral velocity (using pulsed Doppler) / peak early mitral annular diastolic velocity (using pulsed tissue Doppler imaging –TDI) ratio (E/Ea) can be used to group patients according to filling pressures, but the intermediate group ( E/Ea = 8 –15) requires additional information to correctly classify the left ventricular filling pressures(LVFP). Purpose: To assess the relationship between a new echocardiographic parameter, E/(Ea×Sa), where Sa is the peak systolic velocity in TDI of mitral annulus, and LVFP in patients with E/Ea between 8 and 15.

METHODS: Conventional echocardiography and TDI were performed simultaneously with left heart catheterization in 97 patients (pts) in sinus rhythm. Patients with inadequate echocardiographic images, paced rhythm, mitral stenosis, mitral prosthesis, significant organic mitral regurgitation, pericardial disease, acute myocardial infarction or coronary artery by-pass within 72 hours were excluded. E/Ea and E/(Ea×Sa) were calculated; the average of the velocities from the septal and lateral site of the mitral annulus was used.Only 55 pts (age 64±13 years) with E/Ea between 8 and 15 formed the study group. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was measured invasively with fluid-filled catheter.

RESULTS: Simple regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation between E/(Ea×Sa) and LVEDP (r=0,68, p<0,0001), superior to E/Ea correlation (r=0,46, p<0,001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) for E/(Ea×Sa) to detect LVEDP >15 mmHg was 0.95 (95% confidence interval - CI, p<0,0001) versus 0.79 (95% CI, p<0,001) for E/Ea. A E/(Ea×Sa) cut-off value of 1,5 had a sensitivity of 83% , a specificity of 79% and an accuracy of 80% for detecting LVEDP>15 mmHg. E/(Ea×Sa) had a better correlation with LVEDP in pts with normal LV ejection fraction (EF>50%) (18 pts, r=0,68, p=0,001) versus those with depressed LVEF (37 pts, r=0,61, p<0,001).

CONCLUSION: The E/(Ea×Sa) ratio can be used to predict LVFP with reasonable accuracy in patients with E/Ea ratio 8 to 15 in sinus rhythm, with or without depressed LVEF.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: DTI is usefull to estimate LVFP in patients with intermediate E/Ea.

DISCLOSURE: Cristian Mornos, None.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543