0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

THE RAPID SHALLOW BREATHING INDEX: A COMPARISON OF TWO COLLECTION METHODS FREE TO VIEW

Joan Cecich, BS, RRT, AE*; Kimberly Douglass, BS, RRT; Patrick Smego, BS, RRT; Robert Spoula, MBA
Author and Funding Information

Edward Hospital, Naperville, IL


Chest


Chest. 2007;132(4_MeetingAbstracts):573. doi:10.1378/chest.132.4_MeetingAbstracts.573
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI), as measured by Yang and Tobin in 1991, has long been the gold standard for assessment of a patients’ readiness to be weaned from the ventilator. There is little data regarding collection via hand-held spirometer vs. collection via mechanical ventilator.

METHODS: An RSBI via each method was observed 15 minutes apart for each sample during weaning assessment. During hand-held spirometer assessment, the patient was removed from the ventilator and placed on the spirometer with a one-way valve. The first 30 seconds of spontaneous breathing were discarded, and the spirometer was reset. The practitioner then recorded the respiratory rate and minute volume for the next 60 seconds.During assessment via mechanical ventilator, the ventilator mode was changed to CPAP, and pressure support was set to 0. The first 60 seconds of spontaneous breathing were discarded. The practitioner then recorded the respiratory rate and minute volume for the next 2 minutes.

RESULTS: After performing a total of 38 observations using both methods, we analyzed the results using the paired t-test, Peason correlation coefficient, and Spearmans’ rho methodologies. There was a positive correlation between hand-held spirometer scores and ventilator scores for both Peason Correlation coefficient (.77) and Spearmans’ rho (.69). We did not observe any statistically significant differences in scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: RSBI results were unaffected by choice of method in this study. The high positive correlation and lack of statistically significant differences between the two collection methods illustrate the ability of current technology to measure RBSI accurately through a mechanical ventilator.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Measurement of the RSBI via mechanical ventilator may allow clinicians to address the issues of cost management, patient safety and infection control while maintaining the reliability and reproducibility of an index considered to be a clinical standard since 1991.

DISCLOSURE: Joan Cecich, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543