0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

USE OF LEVALBUTEROL BID AND PRN BY RESPIRATORY THERAPIST (RT)-DRIVEN PROTOCOL IN PLACE OF ALBUTEROL SAVED RT TIME AND MONEY: ALLOWED RT INVOLVEMENT IN MORE COMPLEX PROCEDURES FREE TO VIEW

Chris Pekurny, RRT*; Mike Wescoe, RRT
Author and Funding Information

St. Lukes Hospital, Bethlehem, PA


Chest


Chest. 2007;132(4_MeetingAbstracts):532a. doi:10.1378/chest.132.4_MeetingAbstracts.532a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: St. Luke's Hospital, a 475-bed community hospital, faced an Respiratory Therapist (RT) shortage due to an increase in census and acuity of care. Missed treatments were increasing to an average of about 400 to 500 per month. Strategies considered to meet our growing need included hiring an additional 6 RTs or decreasing workload.

METHODS: An updated RT driven protocol was put into place for all beta-agonist therapy except that prescibed by a pulmonologist. The protocol replaced previously used nebulized albuterol q4-6hrs and PRN with nebulized levalbuterol 1.25 mg BID, or q6hr while awake or Q6hr PRN depending on patient acuity. Levalbuterol 0.63 mg was substituted if beta-adrenergic side effects were problematic.

RESULTS: With implementation of the protocol, the number of nebulized doses decreased by 16,033 doses/year (from 95,629 in calander year 2005, when albuterol was used, to 79,596 in calader year 2006 with the use of levalbuterol) which equates to 334 fewer treatments per week. Missed treatments decreased to less then 20 per month with the new protocol. The majority of patients (>75%) were treated by protocol, with over 40% of them successfully treated with levalbuterol BID. RTs were able to participate in more complex procedures such as A-line insertions, attending physician rounds in the ICUs and starting a more aggresive weaning protocol to help decrease ICU length of stay.

CONCLUSION: The use of levalbuterol has allowed us to decrease our nebulizer workload, giving us the abilty to care for our critically ill patients and increase job satisfaction of the RTs. We also did not have to increase our staffing levels, which ultimately saved our institution about $320,000 calander year 2006.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: With the time we no longer spend delivering nebulizer treatments, we are now able to provide more concentrated care for our critically ill patients. We have also had similar success with this protocol at our sister hospital which is a 100 bed community hospital.

DISCLOSURE: Chris Pekurny, None.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543