0
Abstract: Slide Presentations |

NONINVASIVE PULSE CO-OXIMETRY AS A TOOL TO DETECT SMOKING STATUS IN AN OUTPATIENT SETTING FREE TO VIEW

Ashray P. Reddy, High School*; Mary L. Zaremba, APRN, BC; Sridhar P. Reddy, MD MPH FCCP
Author and Funding Information

Detroit Country Day School, Beverly Hills, MI


Chest


Chest. 2007;132(4_MeetingAbstracts):490. doi:10.1378/chest.132.4_MeetingAbstracts.490
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are several methods available to detect smoking status. We evaluated the use of a noninvasive pulse co-oximeter that measures carboxyhemoglobin and methhemoglobin as a tool to detect smoking status in a outpatient setting.

METHODS: We measured at each outpatient visit carboxyhemoglobin and methhemoglobin using a Rad 57 pulse co-oximeter. We asked patients questions regarding their smoking status. The data was analyzed by using standard t-test and we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value along with pre and post test probabilities.

RESULTS: Of the 476 patient visits 98 were smokers, 72 second hand smokers, and 306 non smokers. At a cutoff for carboxyhemoglobin at 6% and higher the sensitivity was 46% with a specificity of 95% to detect a smoker. The positive predictive value was 76% with a negative predictive value of 85%. For methhemoglobin at a cutoff of .7% and higher the sensitivity was 45% with a specificity of 92%. The positive predictive value was 65% with a negative predictive value of 84% for a smoker. The carboxyhemoglobin levels for smokers was 5.9+/-4.45% while the carboxyhemoglobin levels for non smokers was 1.95+/-1.55%. This difference was significant(P=3.60928E-14). The methhemoglobin levels for smokers was .66+/-.31% while the methhemoglobin levels for non smokers was .38+/-.19%. This difference was significant(P=3.34689E-14).The carboxyhemogloblin levels for second hand smokers was 2.79+/-2.89% while the carboxyhemoglobin levels for non smokers was 1.94+/-1.55%. This difference was significant(P=0.001913). The methhemoglobin levels for second hand smokers was 0.49+/-0.25% while the methhemoglobin levels for non smokers was 0.38+/-0.19%. This difference was significant(P=0.000653).

CONCLUSION: In an outpatient clinic setting pulse co-oximetry can be used as a cheap quick and noninvasive method to detect smoking status.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Detecting smoking status is key to effectively counselling patients regarding smoking cessation. Pulse co-oximetry can be effectively used in this situation. In addition its use may be extrapolated to other public health settings such as adolescent smoking cessation programs within school systems to help prevent smoking in vulnerable populations.

DISCLOSURE: Ashray Reddy, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

2:30 PM - 4:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543