0
Abstract: Slide Presentations |

THE UTILITY OF DIFFUSING CAPACITY/ALVEOLAR VOLUME (DLCO/VA) IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF LOW DIFFUSING CAPACITY (DLCO) IN RESTRICTIVE PULMONARY DISORDERS FREE TO VIEW

Eli Gavi, MD*; Steve H. Salzman, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY


Chest


Chest. 2007;132(4_MeetingAbstracts):486a. doi:10.1378/chest.132.4_MeetingAbstracts.486a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: When DLCO is measured at lung volumes below total lung capacity a reduced measurement will be obtained. Some have sought to use DLCO/VA to aid in the interpretation under this circumstance. However, the value of using DLCO/VA when interpretating diffusing capacity measurements remains controversial. In addition, lung diseases that result in a reduced DLCO can be associated with low, normal or high DLCO/VA. We examined the utility of DLCO/VA in the differential diagnosis of a low DLCO in patients with restrictive pulmonary disorders.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of data from a university-affiliated hospital pulmonary function laboratory on patients with disorders that cause restriction. Patients were categorized into interstital lung disorders(ILD)[sarcoidosis and other intersitial lung diseases] or extrapulmonary disorders (EPD)[kyphoscoliosis(KS), obesity(OB), and neuromuscular disorders(NMD)]. Sensitivities and specificities for ILD and EPD were calculated for both DLCO and the combination of DLCO and D/VA of various values.

RESULTS: There were 67 patients identified in the ILD group (sarcoidosis,N=36; other,N=31)and 140 patients in the EPD group (OB,N=93; KS,N=26; NMD,N=21). Results for sensitivity and specificity for diagnoses are expressed in the following format: diagnostic test (sensitivity, specificity). For diagnosis of ILD: DLCO≤;50 (38.8%, 90.0%), DLCO≤;50 and D/VA≤;70 (13.4%, 99.0%), DLCO≤;50 and D/VA≤;90 (31.3%, 95.7%); DLCO≤;60 (59%, 82%), DLCO≤;60 and D/VA≤;70 (13.4, 98.5%), DLCO≤;60 and D/VA≤;90 (44.7%, 94.2%). For diagnosis of EPD: DLCO≤;60 (17.8%, 40.0%), DLCO≤;60 and D/VA≥100 (7.8%, 95.5%); DLCO≤;70 (32.1%, 28.3%), DLCO≤;70 and D/VA≥105 (21.0%, 94.0%).

CONCLUSION: In restrictive disorders, a low DLCO is more characteristic of ILD than EPD. The use of DL/VA in addition to DLCO improved the specificity of the test for the differential diagnosis of a low DLCO in this setting. At any level of reduced DLCO, the lower the DLCO/VA the more specific the test was for ILD; the higher the DLCO/VA the more specific the test was for EPD. Specificities in the mid to high 90's were found when DLCO and DLCO/VA were both used.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: D/VA can contribute to the differential diagnosis of a low DLCO in restrictive pulmonary disorders.

DISCLOSURE: Eli Gavi, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

2:30 PM - 4:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
Guidelines
Infant/toddler pulmonary function tests-2008 revision & update.
American Association for Respiratory Care | 4/3/2009
Removal of the endotracheal tube—2007 revision & update.
American Association for Respiratory Care | 8/17/2007
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543