0
Abstract: Slide Presentations |

Comparison of the two ATS methacholine methods FREE TO VIEW

Donald W. Cockcroft, MD*; Beth E. Davis, BSc; Audrey J. Smycniuk, BSc; David C. Todd, MD
Author and Funding Information

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada


Chest


Chest. 2004;126(4_MeetingAbstracts):744S. doi:10.1378/chest.126.4_MeetingAbstracts.744S
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE:  Guidelines for the two minute tidal breathing and the 5 breath dosimeter methods for methacholine challenge have recently been published by the ATS. Although subjects are exposed to twice as much aerosol at any given concentration during the tidal breathing compared to the dosimeter method, they were thought to give equivalent results. This study was done to compare the 2 methods.

METHODS:  We compared the two methods in 40 subjects with stable asthma, FEV1 > 65 % predicted and a methacholine provocation causing a 20% FEV1 fall (PC20) < 16 mg/ml (tidal breathing method). Tests were done at the same time of day within a 7 day period. All aspects of the testing were identical except for aerosol generation and inhalation.

RESULTS:  The dosimeter provocation concentration causing a 20% FEV1 fall (PC20) was almost twice that of the tidal breathing (geometric PC20, 2.4 vs. 1.3 mg/ml, p<0.00005). Three subjects with mild asthma and mild airway hyperresponsiveness (tidal breathing PC20=1.9-4.3 mg/mL) had a non-measurable PC20 (>32 mg/mL) with the dosimeter; two of these had a measurable PC20 when a modified dosimeter challenge was done with sub-maximal inhalations.

CONCLUSION:  We conclude that the tidal breathing method, which exposes the subject to twice as much aerosol at each concentration, produces approximately twice the response i.e. lower PC20. The TLC manoeuvres with breathold during the dosimeter method may inhibit the response in some patients with asthma.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  The equivalence of the methacholine PC20s obtained by the 2 methods requires reassessment. The TLC inhalations required for the dosimeter method may lead to falsely negative tests in some subjects with mild asthma.

DISCLOSURE:  D.W. Cockcroft, None.

Tuesday, October 26, 2004

10:30 AM- 12:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543