0
Abstract: Poster Presentations |

The Incidence of Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Associated With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in an Intensive Care Unit FREE TO VIEW

Jonathan A. Rettmann, MD; Robert D. Nohavec, RN, BS; Greg Denny, RN; Mary Ann Hendrix, RN, BS; John R. Michael, MD; Boaz A. Markewitz, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

University of Utah Health Sciences Center. Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT


Chest


Chest. 2003;124(4_MeetingAbstracts):237S. doi:10.1378/chest.124.4_MeetingAbstracts.237S-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE:  The use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has increased significantly over the past several years. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) is a known complication of PICCs, with a reported symptomatic incidence of 3-5% in recent large reviews; the incidence of PICC associated UEDVT has not been reported specifically in critically ill patients. Our goal was to determine the incidence of symptomatic PICC associated UEDVT in an intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS:  Retrospective database and chart review of all patients admitted to a 12-bed tertiary university hospital medical intensive care unit (MICU) during 2002. All patients having PICCs placed while in the MICU were included. The database and electronic chart were reviewed to determine which patients with PICCs had a subsequent diagnosis of UEDVT in the ipsilateral extremity. Diagnosis of UEDVT required a positive duplex ultrasound or venogram of the affected extremity. Such studies were ordered at the discretion of the treating physician based upon patient signs/symptoms. The method of DVT prophylaxis in all PICC patients was also obtained from the database.

RESULTS:  Sixteen symptomatic UEDVTs developed in the 113 patients with PICCs (incidence 14.2%). PICC lines were present for a significantly greater number of days in those with versus those without UEDVTs (19.5±3.8 vs. 10.8±1.1; p= .0005). There was no difference between groups in admitting acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, insertion of central venous catheters, or use of heparin or pneumatic compression devices for lower extremity DVT prophylaxis.CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other patient populations in the literature, the incidence of symptomatic PICC associated UEDVT appears to be considerably higher in critically ill patients. The duration of catheter use is significantly associated with the development of symptomatic UEDVTs.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  A high index of clinical suspicion for UEDVT should be maintained in ICU patients with PICCs, particularly in patients with catheters in place for prolonged durations.

DISCLOSURE:  J.A. Rettmann, None.

Wednesday, October 29, 2003

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543