Abstract: Poster Presentations |

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Single Institution Study FREE TO VIEW

Francis J. Podbielski, MD; Ann E. Connolly, MS, NP; Patrick M. McEnaney, MD; Ciaran J. McNamee, MD; A A. Conlan, MD
Author and Funding Information

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA


Chest. 2003;124(4_MeetingAbstracts):234S. doi:10.1378/chest.124.4_MeetingAbstracts.234S-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online


PURPOSE:  To examine the early experience of entirely thoracoscopic lobectomy in treatment of lung nodules at a 780 bed academic medical center.

METHODS:  Prospective data were collected on twenty patients who underwent successful thoracoscopic lobectomy from September 2002 to April 2003 after flexible bronchoscopy and staging mediastinoscopy. The study population consisted of 6 men and 14 women with a mean age of 61 years. A thoracic surgery nurse practitioner performed daily data collection and tracked operative and post-operative complications.

RESULTS:  Length of stay (LOS) analysis showed a median of 4 days and a mean of 7.3 ± 5.8 days. LOS was ≤ 4 days in 55% of study participants. One death occurred in the post-operative period secondary to mesenteric ischemia. Eighteen complications occurred in nine of the twenty patients. Two patients suffered major complications (mesenteric ischemia, colonic volvulus, empyema, and atrial fibrillation). Four patients had prolonged air leaks and two of these patients had clinical subcutaneous emphysema. Eighteen patients were discharged in good condition. Malignant tumors were found in 80% of cases. Tumor size was ≤ 3 cm in 80% of patients. Non-malignant findings included: focal pulmonary vascular congestion, lymphoid infiltrate (2), and emphysema with focal fibrosis.CONCLUSIONS: The mortality of this patient population was 5%, and some type of complication occurred in 45% of patients. In patients with cancer, 69% had stage 1a and 31% had stage 1b disease.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a minimally invasive technique that is gradually gaining acceptance in the thoracic surgery community. Our early experience with this technique demonstrates a favorable length of hospital stay compared to the open approach. Complications encountered are similar to those encountered during minimally invasive pulmonary wedge and segmental resections. We believe that increased surgical volume will result in a lower mean LOS, mortality, and complications.

DISCLOSURE:  F.J. Podbielski, None.

Wednesday, October 29, 2003

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543