Abstract: Poster Presentations |

Influence of the Angle’s Orofacial Classification on the Airway Obstruction FREE TO VIEW

Florence M. Sekito, DDS, MScD; Pedro L. Melo, Eng, PhD
Author and Funding Information

State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil


Chest. 2003;124(4_MeetingAbstracts):226S. doi:10.1378/chest.124.4_MeetingAbstracts.226S-b
Text Size: A A A
Published online


PURPOSE:  The efficiency of the oral appliance therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hipopnea syndrome (OSAS) is a subject under debate in the literature. Orofacial anatomic characteristics affect the respiratory obstruction in distinct ways. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the orofacial categories on the respiratory obstruction. The effect of nasal obstruction was also analyzed.

METHODS:  The studied patients were divided in six groups according to their Angle’s classification in I, II, III classes (normal, mandibular retrognathism, mandibular prognathism, respectively), and the presence of nasal obstruction. All of these patients have no history of smoke or preexisting respiratory disease. Their anthropometric characteristics are described in Table 1

Anthropometric characteristics of the subjects

AGE (years)WEIGHT (kg)HEIGHT (cm)Class I Normal (n=20)38.0±13.061.4±10.9165.6±9.0Class I Obstruction (n=28)40.7±14.364.1±.16.1165.7±9.0Class II Normal (n=6)39.5±13.359.3±7.3163.0±10.2Class II Obstruction (n=10)37.9±10.566.2±12.8165.2±10.8Class III Normal (n=5)36.2±20.268.8±11.8167.4±9.7Class III Obstruction (n=8)31.9±16.573.5±12.2169.4±9.0.The airway obstruction was evaluated by the respiratory impedance, measured by the forced oscillation technique using analysis from the nose (ZN) and from the mouth (ZM) at a frequency of 5 Hz One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences among the classes and statistical difference were considered with a p-value <0.05.

RESULTS:  The results are presented in Table 2

Airway obstruction in different orofacial categories

ZN (cm H2O/L/s)ZM (cm H2O/L/s)Class I Normal4.3±1.32.8±0.8Class I Obstruction6.0±3.43.8±1.9Class II Normal4.7±1.03.4±0.8Class II Obstruction7.6±3.14.4±2.2Class III Normal6.3±0.73.9±0.4Class III Obstruction8.4±3.04.6±0.9. Significant increases in ZN (p<0.01) and ZM (p<0.05) were observed as a result of the modifications in Angle’s class in normal subjects. Although small increases in ZN and ZM were observed in patients with nasal obstruction, these were not significant (p>0.05).CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that the mandibular skeletal variation has positive influence in the airway obstruction, increasing the impedance with Angle’s craniofacial classification. This effect is reduced in the presence of nasal obstruction.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:  In order to optimize the use of intra-oral appliances therapy in patients with sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome, it is important to underwent a previous analysis, and eventual treatment, of craniofacial structure differences and nasal obstruction.

DISCLOSURE:  F.M. Sekito, CNPq, Grant monies.

Wednesday, October 29, 2003

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543