0
Original Research: PULMONARY VASCULAR DISEASE |

Accuracy and Precision of Three Echocardiographic Methods for Estimating Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Javier F. Aduen, MD; Ramon Castello, MD; John T. Daniels, DO; Jesus A. Diaz, MD; Robert E. Safford, MD, PhD; Michael G. Heckman, MS; Julia E. Crook, PhD; Charles D. Burger, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

From the Division of Pulmonary Medicine (Drs Aduen, Daniels, Diaz, and Burger), the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (Dr Safford), the Biostatistics Unit (Mr Heckman and Dr Crook), Mayo Clinic; and the Physicians Research Associates (Dr Castello), Jacksonville, FL.

Correspondence to: Charles D. Burger, MD, FCCP, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; e-mail: burger.charles@mayo.edu.


Presented in part at the American Thoracic Society International Conference in San Diego, California, May 15-20, 2009.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (http://www.chestpubs.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml).


© 2011 American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 2011;139(2):347-352. doi:10.1378/chest.10-0126
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  Pulmonary hypertension is defined as resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) ≥ 25 mm Hg. MPAP pressure estimation by right-sided heart catheterization (RHC) is considered the gold standard; however, its invasiveness limits repeated and frequent use. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of three echocardiographic methods for estimating MPAP.

Methods:  We prospectively studied 117 patients with simultaneous RHC and echocardiography. MPAP was calculated by three echocardiographic methods: (1) mean gradient method (adding the right ventricular–right atrial mean systolic gradient to the right atrial pressure), (2) Chemla equation (0.61 × systolic pulmonary artery pressure + 2 mm Hg), and (3) Syyed equation (0.65 × systolic pulmonary artery pressure + 0.55 mm Hg). MPAP calculated by these three methods was compared with that obtained invasively by RHC.

Results:  The mean ± SD of the differences between invasive MPAP and the three echocardiographic methods were −1.6 ± 7.7 mm Hg for the mean gradient method, −3.7 ± 7.4 mm Hg for the Chemla formula, and −3.2 ± 7.6 mm Hg for the Syyed formula. Median absolute differences were 5.5 mm Hg (mean gradient), 5.7 mm Hg (Chemla; P = .45 vs mean gradient), and 6.0 mm Hg (Syyed; P = .23 vs mean gradient). Accuracy (calculated MPAP within 10 mm Hg of RHC-measured MPAP) was 81% (mean gradient), 77% (Chemla), and 76% (Syyed).

Conclusions:  Echocardiographic estimation of MPAP by the mean gradient method had similar accuracy and precision compared with the Chemla and Syyed methods. The acceptable accuracy of these methods suggests that they are equally suitable for clinical use.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543