Poster Presentations: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 |

Large-Volume Drainage of Malignant Pleural Effusions: Risks and Benefits FREE TO VIEW

Alan D. Sihoe, MA; Nicholson Yam
Author and Funding Information

The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong PRC

Chest. 2010;138(4_MeetingAbstracts):345A. doi:10.1378/chest.9877
Text Size: A A A
Published online


PURPOSE: To prevent Re-expansion Pulmonary Edema (RPE) when draining malignant pleural effusions (MPEs), the maximum drainage on a single occasion has often been arbitrarily limited to 1L. Few studies have addressed the potential risks and benefits of draining larger volumes.

METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients with large, symptomatic MPEs received chest tube insertion by a Cardiothoracic Surgery unit. At the surgeon’s discretion, maximum daily drainage in 32 patients (43%) was limited to 1L. Drainage volumes, clinical progress and serial chest X-rays were assessed for all patients.

RESULTS: In the first hour, the mean volume drained in this cohort overall was 773ml, and over 1L was drained in 30 patients (41%). No patient developed clinical or radiographical RPE as defined by established diagnostic criteria. Five patients (6.8%) developed self-limiting coughing for less than 20 minutes, but no association with initial drainage of over 1L was observed (p=0.32). No other drainage-related complications were experienced by any patient. In patients for whom no maximum daily drainage limit was set, within 24 hours symptomatic improvement was noted in 93% and complete resolution of the MPE on chest X-ray was observed in 40%. This compares to 84% and 28% respectively in those who had limits set, although the differences fell short of statistical significance. In 65 patients for whom chemical pleurodesis was planned at the time of chest tube insertion, the mean interval between tube insertion and pleurodesis was significantly shorter in patients for whom no maximum daily drainage limit was set (4.1 days versus 5.8 days, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION: For large, symptomatic MPEs, drainage of 1L or more in a single sitting appears to be safe.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Foregoing arbitrary limits on maximum daily drainage may reduce delays in giving chemical pleurodesis. Further studies are required to confirm whether this may also expedite symptomatic improvement and complete drainage.

DISCLOSURE: Alan Sihoe, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

12:45 PM - 2:00 PM




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543