Slide Presentations: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 |

Ultrasound-Guided Catheterization of the Radial Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials FREE TO VIEW

Ariel L. Shiloh, MD; Ricahrd H. Savel, MD; Laura M. Paulin, MD; Lewis A. Eisen, MD
Author and Funding Information

Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College Of Medicine, Bronx, NY

Chest. 2010;138(4_MeetingAbstracts):833A. doi:10.1378/chest.9861
Text Size: A A A
Published online


PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guidance is commonly used for the placement of central venous catheters (CVC). The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommends the use of ultrasound for CVC placement as 1 of their 11 practices to improve patient care. Despite increased access to portable ultrasound machines and comfort with ultrasound-guided CVC access, fewer clinicians are familiar with ultrasound-guided techniques of arterial catheterization. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the utility of real-time ultrasound-guidance for radial artery catheterization.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and conference proceedings by two independent reviewers identified randomized controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guidance with palpation techniques of radial artery catheterization. Data were extracted on study design, size, operator and patient characteristics, and the rate of first-attempt success. A meta-analysis was constructed to analyze the data.

RESULTS: Four trials with a total of 311 subjects were included in the review. 159 patients were catheterized using an ultrasound-guided technique, of which 43% had first-attempt success. 152 patients were catheterized using palpation techniques, of which 27% had first-attempt success. Compared with the palpation method, ultrasound-guidance was associated with a 71% improvement in the likelihood of first-attempt success (relative risk 1.71 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.32). Based on the absolute risk reduction of 16%, ultrasound guidance would be required for approximately six arterial catheter placements to prevent more than one attempt at insertion (NNT=6). The trials tended to show that the use of ultrasound-guidance resulted in a higher success rate, a reduced number of attempts, a reduced number of catheters used, and a faster time to catheterization. As the trials did not use uniform criteria to define these outcomes, they could not be combined formally in our meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated a 71% increase in the likelihood of first-attempt success when using ultrasound-guidance for radial artery catheterization.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Ultrasound-guidance is beneficial for radial artery catheterization. Further research is required to demonstrate cost effectiveness and reduction in complication rates.

DISCLOSURE: Ariel Shiloh, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information

2:30 PM - 3:45 PM




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Guidelines on use of vena cava filters.
British Committee for Standards in Haematology | 9/25/2009
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® mesenteric ischemia.
American College of Radiology | 7/10/2009
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543