0
Original Research |

Automatic Titration and Calculation by Predictive Equations for the Determination of Therapeutic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Obstructive Sleep Apnea*

Oreste Marrone, MD; Adriana Salvaggio, MD; Salvatore Romano, MSc; Giuseppe Insalaco, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

*From the Italian National Research Council, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, “A. Monroy,” Sleep Laboratory, Palermo, Italy.

Correspondence to: Oreste Marrone, MD, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Biomedicina e Immunologia Molecolare, Via Ugo La Malfa, 153, 90146 Palermo, Italy; e-mail: marrone@ibim.cnr.it


Chest. 2008;133(3):670-676. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1372
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background: It is unknown to what extent therapeutic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) levels obtained by various methods for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) differ. This study aimed to explore the relationships among pressures titrated by an automatic CPAP (APAP) device and those calculated using different predictive equations, and to compare different ranges of calculated pressures with pressure values titrated by APAP.

Methods: In 140 OSAS patients, the 95th percentile pressure delivered by an APAP device (AutoSet T; ResMed; Sydney, NSW, Australia) during polysomnography, and pressures calculated by three equations (equation 1, Hoffstein and Miljetig [1994]; equation 2, Sériès et al [2000]; and equation 3, Stradling et al [2004]) were compared.

Results: Titrated and calculated pressures were weakly correlated. Significant differences were found between the mean (± SD) pressures (11.1 ± 1.6, 8.3 ± 1.8, 10.5 ± 1.6, and 10.3 ± 1.3 cm H2O, respectively) for 95th percentile APAP, and pressures calculated by equations 1, 2, and 3, except between values calculated by equations 2and 3. Differences between the calculated and APAP-derived pressures were negative for the low calculated values, and were progressively attenuated, or became positive, for the high values. The differences were smallest for calculated pressures from 11 to > 13 cm H2O, which were represented to a greater extent among the values calculated by equations 2and 3 than by those calculated by equation 1.

Conclusions: Considerably different therapeutic CPAP levels may be determined using various methods. The differences between the calculated and APAP-derived pressures are largest for calculated values of < 9 or > 15 cm H2O. The clinical consequences of these findings deserve further evaluation. Caution is still required before treating OSAS patients with calculated pressures.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543