0
Original Research: COPD |

Reproducibility of the Negative Expiratory Pressure Technique in COPD*

Rachel Walker, BAppSc(Hons); Jennifer Paratz, PhD; Anne E. Holland, PhD
Author and Funding Information

*From the School of Physiotherapy (Ms. Walker and Dr. Holland), La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; and the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care (Dr. Paratz), University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Correspondence to: Anne E. Holland, PhD, La Trobe University, Physiotherapy Department, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 3068; e-mail: a.holland@alfred.org.au



Chest. 2007;132(2):471-476. doi:10.1378/chest.07-0062
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background: Tidal expiratory flow limitation (EFL) contributes to chronic dyspnea and exercise intolerance in COPD patients. It can be assessed with the negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique and is expressed as either the percentage of the tidal volume over which EFL occurs (EFL%Vt) or according to more detailed three-point or five-point scoring systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the NEP technique in COPD patients.

Methods: Tidal EFL was evaluated with NEP in 18 subjects with stable COPD (FEV1 range, 18 to 75% predicted) on two occasions (mean retest interval, 8.2 days) by the same rater. Agreement between testing occasions was assessed with the κ statistic for the 3-point and 5-point EFL scores, and with the coefficient of repeatability for EFL%Vt.

Results: On the first testing occasion, nine subjects had no EFL, four subjects had EFL in the supine position, and five subjects had EFL in the sitting and the supine position. Using the 3-point score, agreement was present in 14 of 18 subjects at time 2 (κ = 0.66), indicating substantial agreement. Using the 5-point score, agreement was seen in 13 of 18 subjects (κ = 0.61), also indicating substantial agreement. The reproducibility of EFL%Vt measurements was lower than that required to reliably detect clinical change in both the sitting and supine positions (coefficient of repeatability, 37% and 58%, respectively).

Conclusions: The 3-point and 5-point scores provide a reproducible assessment of EFL in COPD patients. The classification of EFL as a percentage of tidal volume is less reproducible, and large changes are required to be confident that real clinical change has occurred.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543