0
Original Research: PULMONARY VASCULAR DISEASE |

Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Using Real-time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography*: Comparison With Cardiac MRI

Carly Jenkins, MS; Jonathan Chan, MD; Kristen Bricknell, MS; Mark Strudwick, PhD; Thomas H. Marwick, MD, PhD
Author and Funding Information

*From the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Correspondence to: Thomas H. Marwick, MD, PhD, University of Queensland, Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Brisbane Q4102, QLD, Australia; e-mail: tmarwick@soms.uq.edu.au



Chest. 2007;131(6):1844-1851. doi:10.1378/chest.06-2143
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives: The nongeometric nature of the right ventricle (RV) makes it difficult to measure. We sought to determine whether real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) is superior to two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) for the follow-up of RV function by validation vs cardiac MRI.

Methods: RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) were studied with 2DE (including area-length [A-L], the modified two-dimensional subtraction [2DS] method, and the Simpson method of discs), RT3DE, and MRI in 50 patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities, the results of which suggested possible RV infarction. Test-retest variation was performed by a complete restudy using a separate sonographer within 24 h without the alteration of hemodynamics or therapy. Interobserver and intraobserver variations were noted in a subgroup of 20 patients.

Results: EF estimations were similar using each technique. The mean (± SD) MRI end-diastolic volume (87 ± 22 mL) was only slightly underestimated by RT3DE (mean difference, −3 ± 10; p < 0.05), with a greater mean difference for 2DE A-L (−29 ± 10; p < 0.05), and the Simpson method of discs (−29 ± 23; p < 0.05), and was greatly overestimated by 2DS (mean difference, 26 ± 23; p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean MRI end-systolic volume (46 ± 17 mL) was only slightly underestimated by RT3DE (−4 ± 7; p < 0.05), compared with 2DE A-L (−16 ± 8; p < 0.05) and the Simpson method of discs (−16 ± 8; p < 0.05), and was overestimated by 2DS (14 ± 13; p < 0.05). RT3DE findings had a higher correlation with each parameter than any 2DE technique. There was also good intraobserver and interobserver correlation between RT3DE by two sonographers. RT3DE had less test-retest variation of RV volumes and EF than any 2DE measure.

Conclusions: RT3DE is more accurate than two-dimensional approaches and reduces the test-retest variation of RV volumes and EF measurements in follow-up RV assessment.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Guidelines
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543