0
Original Research: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE |

Agreement Between Quantitative Cultures of Postintubation Tracheal Aspiration and Plugged Telescoping Catheter, Protected Specimen Brush, or BAL for the Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia*

Christophe Clec’h, MD; Françoise Jauréguy, PharmD; Lilia Hamza, MD; Philippe Karoubi, MD; Jean-Philippe Fosse, MD; Aïcha Hamdi, MD; François Vincent, MD; Frédéric Gonzalez, MD; Yves Cohen, MD
Author and Funding Information

*From the Service de Réanimation (Drs. Clec’h, Hamza, Karoubi, Fosse, Hamdi, Vincent, Gonzalez, and Cohen), and the Département de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène (Dr. Jauréguy), Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France.

Correspondence to: Yves Cohen, MD, Service de Réanimation, Hôpital Avicenne, 125, route de Stalingrad, 93009 Bobigny Cedex, France; e-mail: yves.cohen@avc.aphp.fr



Chest. 2006;130(4):956-961. doi:10.1378/chest.130.4.956
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background: The diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia relies on protected specimen brush (PSB), BAL, and plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) procedures. In the particular setting of nosocomial pneumonia (NP) occurring in non-mechanically ventilated patients, no consensus exists on their use. When mechanical ventilation (MV) becomes mandatory, postintubation tracheal aspiration (PITA) could be a simple, fast, and cheap diagnostic tool. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of PITA to that of PSB, BAL, or PTC in patients requiring MV for suspected NP.

Methods: Patients with a prior hospital stay of ≥ 48 h who required MV for suspicion of NP were prospectively enrolled in the study. PITA was performed by sterile suction. Within 2 h, pulmonary samples were obtained by PSB, BAL, or blinded PTC, which are referred to hereafter as “reference methods” (RMs). The definite diagnosis of NP was made using a composite item of clinical, radiologic, and bacteriologic (ie, blood or pleural fluid cultures) patterns. The agreement between the quantitative microbiological results obtained with PITA and those of the RMs was assessed by the κ-statistic. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of PITA and RMs were calculated taking the definite diagnosis of NP as the reference.

Results: There were 44 cases (63.8%) of confirmed NP. The κ-statistic was 0.71. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 77%, 84%, 4.80, and 0.27, respectively, for PITA, and 75%, 88%, 6.25, and 0.28, respectively, for RMs.

Conclusions: PITA may be a reliable alternative to RMs in the particular setting of NP in newly mechanically ventilated patients.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation*: A Prospective Comparison of the Plugged Telescoping Catheter With the Protected Specimen Brush
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543