0
Original Research: INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY |

Angled Forceps Used for Transbronchial Biopsy in Which Standard Forceps Are Difficult To Manipulate*: A Comparative Study

Shinji Sasada, MD; Yoshitaka Ogata, MD; Masashi Kobayashi, MD; Tomonori Hirashima, MD; Kunimitsu Kawahara, MD, PhD; Kaoru Matsui, MD; Ichiro Kawase, MD
Author and Funding Information

*From the Departments of Thoracic Malignancy (Drs. Sasada, Kobayashi, Hirashima, and Matsui) and Pathology (Dr. Kawahara), Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Osaka, Japan; and the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Rheumatic Diseases (Drs. Ogata and Kawase), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Correspondence to: Shinji Sasada, Department of Thoracic Malignancy, Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Disease, 3-7-1 Habikino, Habikino-Shi, Osaka 583-8588, Japan; e-mail: s-sasada@hbk.pref.osaka.jp



Chest. 2006;129(3):725-733. doi:10.1378/chest.129.3.725
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of the Sasada transbronchial angled forceps (STAF) in patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), which are difficult to manipulate with standard forceps.

Methods: We have invented the STAF, a forceps with an angled tip. One hundred ten patients with PPLs that were difficult to reach with standard forceps were retrospectively evaluated. The patients first underwent bronchoscopy with a standard forceps and then with the STAF. The specimens obtained with standard forceps and those obtained with STAF were separately fixed and analyzed histologically. We compared the histologic diagnosis of the specimens obtained by STAF with that obtained by the specimens obtained with standard forceps. Statistical significance was calculated with the McNemar χ2 statistic.

Results: The diagnostic yield of all lesions from the specimens obtained with STAF (86 of 110 lesions; 78.2%) was significantly higher than that of lesions from the specimens obtained with standard forceps (43 of 110 lesions; 39.1%; p < 0.001). Among malignant lesions, the yield obtained with STAF (60 of 72 lesions; 83.3%) was significantly higher than that obtained with standard forceps (32 of 72 lesions; 44.4%; p < 0.001). Among benign lesions, the yield obtained with STAF (26 of 38 lesions; 68.4%) was also significantly higher than that obtained with standard forceps (11 of 38 lesions; 28.9%; p < 0.001). Among the different lesion areas, the right upper lobe plus the left upper division gave the greatest difference in yield (STAF, 46 of 60 lesions; 76.7%; standard forceps, 22 of 60 lesions; 36.7%; p < 0.001). Among the different size ranges, the diagnostic yields obtained with STAF were significantly higher than that obtained with standard forceps except for the size range of ≤ 10 mm. There were two complications, pneumothorax and bronchial bleeding, both of which were controlled easily.

Conclusions: The STAF was shown to be useful for obtaining specimens that were sufficient for histologic diagnosis from PPLs that were difficult to manipulate with standard forceps.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543