0
Clinical Investigations in Critical Care |

Introduction of a 14-Hour Work Shift Model for Housestaff in the Medical ICU*

Bekele Afessa, MD, FCCP; Cassie C. Kennedy, MD; Kyle W. Klarich, MD; Timothy R. Aksamit, MD, FCCP; Joseph C. Kolars, MD; Rolf D. Hubmayr, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

*From the Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs. Afessa, Kennedy, Aksamit, and Hubmayr), Cardiovascular Disease (Dr. Klarich), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Dr. Kolars), Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.

Correspondence to: Bekele Afessa, MD, FCCP, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: afessa.bekele@mayo.edu



Chest. 2005;128(6):3910-3915. doi:10.1378/chest.128.6.3910
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objective: To describe the outcomes of switching housestaff from a traditional model of “long-call” every 4 days to a 14-h work-shift model in a medical ICU (MICU) over a 5-week pilot period.

Design: Retrospective comparison of a 5-week pilot period for a 14-h work-shift model vs a 4-month period for the traditional model.

Setting: The MICU of a tertiary medical center.

Participants: A total of 626 patients admitted to the MICU and 34 internal medicine residents taking care of them.

Interventions: None.

Measurements: Severity-adjusted patient outcomes, housestaff performance on end-of-rotation examinations, and scheduled duty hours during the 5-week 14-h work-shift pilot period compared to a 16-week traditional nonpilot work period.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in patients’ adjusted mortality rates, hospital lengths of stay, or housestaff performance on end-of-rotation knowledge assessment examinations between the pilot and nonpilot periods. During the pilot period, each resident was scheduled to work for an average of 61.3 h weekly, and each fellow for 65.3 h weekly. In comparison, each resident and fellow was scheduled to work for an average of 73.3 h weekly during the nonpilot period.

Conclusions: The 14-h work shift is a feasible option for housestaff rotation in the MICU. Although the power of our study to detect significant differences in mortality, length of stay, and educational outcomes was low, there was no evidence of compromised patient care or housestaff education associated with the 14-h shift model over the course of this 5-week pilot study.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Guidelines
Critical care in pregnancy.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists | 7/10/2009
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543