0
Communications to the Editor |

Pneumothorax Following Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration of the Lung FREE TO VIEW

Ryland P. Byrd, Jr, MD; Thomas M. Roy, MD
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: Quillen Veterans Affairs Medical Center Mountain Home, TN,  Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN,  Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Gyeonggi-Do, Korea

Correspondence to: Ryland P. Byrd, Jr, MD, Veterans Affairs Medical Center 111-B, PO Box 4000, Mountain Home, TN 37684-4000; e-mail: Ryland.Byrd@med.va.gov



Chest. 2005;128(2):1071-1072. doi:10.1378/chest.128.2.1071
Text Size: A A A
Published online

To the Editor:

We read with interest the article by Choi et al1(November 2004) concerning the incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of pulmonary lesions guided by a variety of radiologic techniques. The article is both well written and informative. As the authors indicate in their discussion, it is a common practice to obtain a chest radiograph typically 4 h after percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration.2

The incidences of early and delayed pneumothorax in the study by Choi et al were 18.6% and 3.3%, respectively. However, all of the patients in their study who required tube thoracostomy for delayed pneumothorax were symptomatic. This represents < 1% of their study population. Interestingly, none of the patients in this study with delayed pneumothorax had undergone CT-guided FNA. We have previously reported that immediate pneumothorax develops in 17.2 to 24.1% of patients undergoing CT-guided FNA.34 In our studies, delayed pneumothorax occurs in 2.5 to 3.1% of patients who underwent this procedure. Moreover, delayed pneumothorax requiring intervention with pleural space evacuation occurred in 1.3 to 1.6% of patients.

While we agree the conclusion of Choi et al that late pneumothorax is clinically important, the practice of obtaining a delayed postprocedure chest radiograph after CT-guided FNA does not appear to be an efficient use of resources. Based on our research, chest radiography appears to add little information regarding lung expansion to that obtained by CT at the end of CT-guided FNA. Instruction to seek medical attention in the event of symptoms of pneumothorax appears be a more effective method of addressing this potential complication.

Choi, CM, Um, SW, Yoo, CG, et al (2004) Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung.Chest126,1516-1521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Perlmutt, LM, Braun, SD, Newman, GE, et al Timing of chest film follow-up after transthoracic needle aspiration.AJR Am J Roentgenol1986;146,1049-1050. [PubMed]
 
Byrd, RP, Jr, Fields-Ossirio, C, Roy, TM Delayed chest radiographs and the diagnosis of pneumothorax following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions.Respir Med1999;93,379-381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Shantazeerappa, HN, Mathai, MG, Byrd, RP, Jr, et al Intervention in patients with pneumothorax immediately following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary nodules.Med Sci Monit2002;8,401-404
 
To the Editor:

In our study (November 2004),1most transthoracic needle biopsies were performed by fluoroscopic and ultrasonography guidance. Only 4.5% of the transthoracic needle biopsies (21 of 458) were performed with CT scan guidance. Therefore, it is difficult to compare our data to the data of Byrd et al2and Shantaveerappa et al.3

Definitely, CT scanning is more sensitive than a posteroanterior chest radiograph for the detection of pneumothorax. After the analysis of our data, we had a suspicion that a delayed pneumothorax was simply so small and localized that it would go undetected by a posteroanterior chest radiograph at 4 h but would be detectable by CT scan if one were performed.

However, according to his previous work, delayed pneumothorax still occurred in 4 of 158 patients (2.53%) even though a CT scan was performed after the CT scan/fine-needle aspiration.3 This rate is not so different from that in our study1 (3.3%; 15 of 458). The study by Shantaveerappa et al3 helps us to resolve our suspicion. Furthermore, the rate of intervention was even higher (all patients, 1.7% [2 of 158]; patients with delayed pneumothorax, 50% [2 of 4]) in their study3 than that in ours (all patients, 0.65% [3 of 458]; patients with delayed pneumothorax, 20% [3 of 15]).1 I think that the two studies showed quite similar data but different interpretations.

References
Choi, CM, Um, SW, Yoo, CG, et al Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung.Chest2004;126,1516-1521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Byrd, RP, Jr, Fields-Ossorio, C, Roy, TM Delayed chest radiographs and the diagnosis of pneumothorax following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions.Respir Med1999;93,379-381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Shantaveerappa, HN, Mathai, MG, Byrd, RP, Jr, et al Intervention in patients with pneumothorax immediately after CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary nodules.Med Sci Monit2002;8,401-404
 

Figures

Tables

References

Choi, CM, Um, SW, Yoo, CG, et al (2004) Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung.Chest126,1516-1521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Perlmutt, LM, Braun, SD, Newman, GE, et al Timing of chest film follow-up after transthoracic needle aspiration.AJR Am J Roentgenol1986;146,1049-1050. [PubMed]
 
Byrd, RP, Jr, Fields-Ossirio, C, Roy, TM Delayed chest radiographs and the diagnosis of pneumothorax following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions.Respir Med1999;93,379-381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Shantazeerappa, HN, Mathai, MG, Byrd, RP, Jr, et al Intervention in patients with pneumothorax immediately following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary nodules.Med Sci Monit2002;8,401-404
 
Choi, CM, Um, SW, Yoo, CG, et al Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung.Chest2004;126,1516-1521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Byrd, RP, Jr, Fields-Ossorio, C, Roy, TM Delayed chest radiographs and the diagnosis of pneumothorax following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions.Respir Med1999;93,379-381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Shantaveerappa, HN, Mathai, MG, Byrd, RP, Jr, et al Intervention in patients with pneumothorax immediately after CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary nodules.Med Sci Monit2002;8,401-404
 
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543