0
Editorials |

The “Goldilocks” Principle

Alex G. Little, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: Dayton, OH
 ,  Dr. Little is Elizabeth Berry Gray Chair and Professor, Wright State University Department of Surgery.

Correspondence to: Alex G. Little, MD, FCCP, 1 Wyoming St, Suite 7000 WCHE, Dayton, OH 45409; e-mail: alex.little@wright.edu



Chest. 2005;128(1):13-14. doi:10.1378/chest.128.1.13
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

The article by Jaklitsch and colleagues (see page 237) is an important contribution to the challenge of making appropriate surgical decisions in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To use “Goldilocksian” analysis, the challenge for thoracic surgeons is to get the operation neither too hot (a resection of more lung than necessary) nor too cold (an insufficient resection), but to get it just right.

To put this issue into perspective, through the first decades of the twentieth century there were only a few, anecdotal reports of lung resection for lung cancer. The description by Graham and Singer1 in 1993 of the performance (and not unimportantly the patient’s survival) of the first pneumonectomy for lung cancer established a role for surgical resection in the treatment of lung cancer patients. In fact, surgical resection became relatively standard with pneumonectomy being the cancer operation of choice. Over time, however, experience has showed that an anatomic lobectomy was technically feasible and resulted in the same outcomes as the more extensive operation, for patients with a similar stage of disease, if the primary tumor was limited to a lobe. This then resulted in a transition in the thoracic surgery community to lobectomy as the preferred procedure to preserve the maximum amount of pulmonary reserve. At present, pneumonectomy is reserved for patients with such centrally located cancers that even the technique of sleeve resection does not allow a lobectomy to encompass all disease. Resections less than lobectomy, which leave behind intrapulmonary lymphatics as well as parenchyma, such as wedge resection and segmentectomy have been generally considered to be marginally or completely inadequate cancer procedures and employed sparingly and selectively for patients with limited pulmonary reserve and/or comorbid conditions leading to the assessment of the patient as a poor candidate for a “major” operation.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543