0
Clinical Investigations in Critical Care |

A Descriptive Evaluation of Transfusion Practices in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation*

Mitchell M. Levy, MD, FCCP; Edward Abraham, MD; Marya Zilberberg, MD, FCCP; Neil R. MacIntyre, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

*From Brown University School of Medicine (Dr. Levy), Worcester, MA; University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Dr. Abraham), Boulder, CO; Ortho Biotech Products (Dr. Zilberberg), L.P., Bridgewater, NJ; and Duke University Medical Center (Dr. MacIntyre), Durham, NC.

Correspondence to: Mitchell M. Levy, MD, FCCP, Professor of Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy St, Main 7, Providence, RI, 02903; e-mail: mitchell_levy@brown.edu



Chest. 2005;127(3):928-935. doi:10.1378/chest.127.3.928
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objectives: To characterize and compare transfusion practices in a broad sample of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) and not receiving MV in the ICU.

Design: Retrospective subgroup analysis from the prospective, multicenter, observational CRIT study.

Setting: Two hundred eighty-four medical, surgical, or medical/surgical ICUs.

Patients: Critically ill adults.

Main results: Of the 4,892 patients enrolled in the CRIT study, 60% were receiving MV on ICU admission or within 48 h after admission for a median of 4 days. Patients receiving MV had higher baseline APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II scores than patients not receiving MV (22.8 ± 7.8 and 14.9 ± 6.4, respectively [mean ± SD]; p < 0.0001). Despite similar baseline hemoglobin levels (11.0 ± 2.3 g/dL and 10.9 ± 2.5 g/dL, p = 0.17), more patients receiving MV underwent transfusions (49% vs 33%, p < 0.0001), and they received significantly more RBCs than patients not receiving MV (p < 0.0001). The principal reason for transfusion in both groups was low hemoglobin level (78.4% and 84.6%, respectively); however, patients receiving MV had higher pretransfusion hemoglobin levels (8.7 ± 1.7 g/dL) than patients not receiving MV (8.2 ± 1.7 g/dL, p < 0.0001). Notably, 40.1% of all transfusions in patients receiving MV were administered after day 3 of the ICU stay, compared to 21.2% in patients not receiving MV (p < 0.0001), and a higher percentage of patients receiving MV remaining in the ICU after day 3 underwent transfusions (33.4% vs 18.3%, p < 0.0001). Mortality was higher (17.2% vs 4.5%, p < 0.0001) and mean hospital (15 days vs 10 days, p < 0.0001) and ICU stays (9 days vs 4 days, p < 0.0001) were longer in the subgroup receiving MV.

Conclusions: Mechanical ventilation appears to be an easily identifiable early marker for allogeneic blood exposure risk in ICU patients. While the longer ICU stays account for much of this risk, patients receiving MV also appear to undergo transfusions at higher hemoglobin thresholds than patients not receiving MV, at least early in the ICU stay. Justification of this relatively liberal transfusion practice in patients receiving MV will require further study.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543