0
Clinical Investigations: ASTHMA |

Effect of Spirometric Maneuver, Nasal Clip, and Submaximal Inspiratory Effort on Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels in Asthmatic Patients*

Augustine K. H. Tee, MMed; Kok P. Hui, MD, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

*From the Department of Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.

Correspondence to: Augustine K. H. Tee, MMed; Department of Medicine, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore 529889; e-mail: augustine_tee@cgh.com.sg



Chest. 2005;127(1):131-134. doi:10.1378/chest.127.1.131
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objectives: The measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) in asthmatic patients is increasingly being used to aid diagnosis and management. To standardize the measurement techniques, the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society guidelines were published, but these were based mainly on expert opinions without strong clinical evidence on many aspects. We investigated the effect of three different factors on the on-line measurement of eNO. In a clinical setting, we evaluated the effect of prior spirometry, the use of nasal clips, and the influence of submaximal inspiratory effort on on-line eNO readings. Recommended guidelines on these factors have been published but have been supported by scanty research data.

Methods: Three groups of stable asthmatic patients (30 patients in each group) had eNO measurements made on-line (NIOX; Aerocrine AB; Solna, Sweden) before and 5 min after performing spirometric maneuvers, without and with a nasal clip, or with maximal and then submaximal inspiratory efforts.

Results: There were no significant differences in mean eNO levels among all three groups, before and after spirometry (68.2 vs 66.0 parts per billion [ppb], respectively; mean difference, 2.2 ppb; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.4 to 4.9; p = 0.090), without use of a nasal clip compared with its use (46.7 vs 45.6 ppb, respectively; mean difference, 1.1 ppb; 95% CI, −0.7 to 2.8; p = 0.234), and maximal or submaximal inspiratory effort (52.6 vs 51.2 ppb, respectively; mean difference, 1.4 ppb; 95% CI, −0.3 to 3.0; p = 0.096).

Conclusion: We conclude that on-line eNO measurements in clinical practice are not significantly affected by prior spirometry maneuver, use of a nasal clip, or submaximal inspiratory effort.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543