0
Clinical Investigations in Critical Care |

Changing Pattern of Ventilator Settings in Patients Without Acute Lung Injury : Changes Over 11 Years in a Single Institution*

Phunsup Wongsurakiat, MD, FCCP; David J. Pierson, MD, FCCP; Gordon D. Rubenfeld, MD, MSc, FCCP
Author and Funding Information

Correspondence to: Phunsup Wongsurakiat, MD, FCCP, Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand; e-mail: sipwo@mahidol.ac.th



Chest. 2004;126(4):1281-1291. doi:10.1378/chest.126.4.1281
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objectives: To determine whether the widely accepted concept of using lower tidal volume (Vt) values in patients with ARDS or obstructive lung disease has affected the pattern of ventilator settings in mechanically ventilated patients who do not have one of these conditions.

Design and patients: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and had received ventilatory support for ≥ 1 day at a university-affiliated county hospital during the years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1995, 1998, 1999, and 2000.

Results: In 139 such patients, the mean final Vt values used on the first day of mechanical ventilation were 11.7, 12.4, 11.3, 9.6, 9.7, 9.2, and 9.8 mL/kg in those years, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that increasing year (β-coefficient = −0.24; p = 0.001) and the presence of pulmonary edema (β-coefficient = −1.2; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of the use of lower Vt values. Patients managed with a low Vt (ie, < 10 mL/kg; mean [± SD] Vt, 8.4 ± 1.3 mL/kg) had a significantly higher incidence of atelectasis than the patients who were managed with traditional, larger Vt values (ie, ≥ 10 mL/kg; mean Vt, 11.8 ± 1.5 mL/kg) [61.1% vs 36.7%, respectively; p = 0.02]. Multivariate analysis revealed that the mean Vt used on days 1, 2, and 3 (<10 mL/kg or ≥ 10 mL/kg) was the only predictor of the development of atelectasis during the first 3 days of mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 0.33; p = 0.015). There was no difference in the incidence of pneumonia, the number of days spent receiving mechanical ventilation, Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, or respiratory system compliance between the low Vt group and the traditional Vt group.

Conclusion: Currently, physicians at our hospital use lower Vt values than they have in the past. This is associated with the increase in the incidence of atelectasis in the patients who received ventilation using low Vt values.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatrics. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007;83(2 Suppl):S100-8.
Guidelines
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543