0
Clinical Investigations: NUCLEAR MEDICINE |

The Utility of 99mTc Depreotide Compared With F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Surgical Staging in Patients With Suspected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer*

Daniel Kahn; Yusuf Menda; Kemp Kernstine; David Bushnell; Kelley McLaughlin; Sara Miller; Kevin Berbaum
Author and Funding Information

*From the Nuclear Medicine Section (Drs. Kahn and Bushnell, and Ms. Miller), Iowa City VA Medical Center; and Departments of Radiology (Drs. Berbaum and Menda) and Surgery (Dr. Kernstine and Ms. McLaughlin), University of Iowa, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.

Correspondence to: Daniel Kahn, MD, Nuclear Medicine Section, 115, Iowa City VAMC, Iowa City, IA 52246; e-mail: daniel-kahn@uiowa.edu



Chest. 2004;125(2):494-501. doi:10.1378/chest.125.2.494
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objectives: The findings from conventional imaging modalities, such as chest CT, are frequently unreliable in patients with lung cancer. This study was designed to compare the relative diagnostic accuracies and utility of the two most widely used functional imaging examinations, F-18–2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and 99mTc depreotide scintigraphy, for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer.

Design: Prospective, experimental investigation.

Setting: Academic medical center.

Patients: One hundred sixty-six subjects with suspected lung cancer were enrolled in the study.

Interventions: Whole-body and single-photon emission CT imaging of the chest was performed after IV administration of 99mTc depreotide. Attenuation-corrected FDG PET imaging was performed after IV administration of FDG. Image findings were compared with the biopsy results or clinical follow-up.

Measurements and results: In 157 subjects with evaluable lung lesions, the sensitivities and specificities for detecting malignant disease (95% confidence intervals) of FDG PET are 96% (90 to 98%) and 71% (54 to 85%), and of 99mTc depreotide are 94% (88 to 98%) and 51% (34 to 68%). In the 139 subjects with available complete staging data, FDG PET correctly staged 76 of 139 patients (55%), and 99mTc depreotide correctly staged 63 of 139 patients (45%).

Conclusions: The sensitivity for detection of lung cancer in the primary lesion is equally high for FDG PET and 99mTc depreotide. The specificity is superior for FDG PET. The staging accuracy of FDG PET and 99mTc depreotide is similar, but when read with the chest CT neither scintigraphic examination is sufficiently accurate to stage patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543