0
Clinical Investigations: SLEEP AND BREATHING |

Lack of Efficacy for a Cervicomandibular Support Collar in the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea*

Margot A. Skinner; Ruth N. Kingshott; David R. Jones; D. Robin Taylor
Author and Funding Information

*From the Respiratory Research Unit (Ms. Skinner, and Drs. Kingshott and Taylor), Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin; and Tom McKendrick Sleep Laboratory (Mr. Jones), Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Correspondence to: Margot A. Skinner, MPhEd, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand; e-mail: mskinner@gandalf.otago.ac.nz



Chest. 2004;125(1):118-126. doi:10.1378/chest.125.1.118
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objectives: The effect of therapy using a cervicomandibular support collar (CMSC) to manage obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was compared with standard therapy, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).

Design: Subjects received treatment with CMSC or nCPAP each for 1 month in random order. The study was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Setting: Tom McKendrick Sleep Laboratory, Dunedin Hospital.

Participants:Ten adult subjects with mild-to-moderate OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], 24 ± 13/h slept [mean ± SD]) completed the study.

Interventions: The CMSC was designed to prevent mandibular movement and hold the head in slight extension, thus preventing the postural changes that might contribute to OSA. Positioning of the CMSC was confirmed by an externally applied cervical range of motion (CROM) instrument and by cephalometry. Subjects were carefully instructed in the use of each device and completed a symptom diary. After 1 month, subjects underwent polysomnography with each of the allocated devices in situ, and symptom questionnaires were administered.

Measurements and results:Treatment success (AHI ≤ 10/h slept) with CMSC was achieved in only 2 of 10 subjects, partial success (AHI > 10/h to ≤ 15/h slept) was achieved in 2 subjects, and in 6 of 10 subjects there was no benefit. In contrast, treatment success was achieved in 7 of 10 subjects receiving nCPAP. Mean AHI was 29.4 ± 13.4/h at baseline, 26.9 ± 17.2/h slept with CMSC, and 9.9 ± 8.0/h slept with nCPAP (p = 0.001). No significant differences in sleep architecture or sleep efficiency were achieved using nCPAP compared to CMSC. The efficacy of the CMSC in maintaining the desired head position was confirmed by cephalometry and the CROM instrument.

Conclusions: Our results, although negative, provide important evidence that control of head and neck posture, perhaps adopted as a second-line treatment, is not helpful in the management of OSA. It appears that other anatomic and physiologic factors have a dynamic overriding influence on upper airway closure compared to simple skeletal relationships.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Guidelines
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543