0
Clinical Investigations: COPD |

The Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate (250 μg)/Salmeterol (50 μg) Combined in the Diskus Inhaler for the Treatment of COPD*

Nicola A. Hanania; Patrick Darken; Donald Horstman; Colin Reisner; Benjamin Lee; Suzanne Davis; Tushar Shah
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: *From the Baylor College of Medicine (Dr. Hanania), Houston, TX; and GlaxoSmithKline, Inc (Drs. Darken, Horstman, Reisner, Lee, and Shah, and Ms. Davis), Research Triangle Park, NC.,  A list of investigators who contributed to this study is located in the Appendix.

Correspondence to: Nicola A. Hanania, MD, FCCP, Ben Taub General Hospital, Pulmonary/Critical Care, 1504 Taub Loop, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: hanania@bcm.tmc.edu



Chest. 2003;124(3):834-843. doi:10.1378/chest.124.3.834
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) and the inhaled long-acting β2-agonist salmeterol (SM), when administered together in a single device (Diskus; GlaxoSmithKline, Inc; Research Triangle Park, NC), with that of placebo and the individual agents alone in patients with COPD.

Design: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: Seventy-six investigative sites in the United States.

Patients: Seven hundred twenty-three patients ≥ 40 years of age with COPD and a mean baseline FEV1 of 42% predicted.

Interventions: FP (250 μg), SM (50 μg), FP plus SM combined in a single inhaler (FSC), or placebo administered twice daily through the Diskus device for 24 weeks.

Measurements: Primary efficacy measures were morning predose (ie, trough FEV1) for FSC compared with SM and 2-h postdose FEV1 for FSC compared with FP. Other efficacy measures were as follows: morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEF); transition dyspnea index; chronic respiratory disease questionnaire; chronic bronchitis symptom questionnaire; exacerbations; and other symptomatic measures.

Results: At Endpoint (ie, the last on-treatment, post-baseline assessment), treatment with FSC significantly (p ≤ 0.012) increased the morning predose FEV1 (165 mL) compared with SM (91 mL) and placebo (1 mL), and significantly (p ≤ 0.001) increased the 2-h postdose FEV1 (281 mL) compared with FP (147 mL) and placebo (58 mL). Improvements in lung function with FSC compared with FP and SM, and with FP and SM compared with placebo, as measured by the average daily morning PEF, was observed within approximately 24 h after the initiation of treatment, indicating an early onset of effect (p ≤ 0.034). Compared with placebo, FSC significantly improved dyspnea, quality of life, and symptoms of chronic bronchitis. The incidence of adverse effects (except for an increase in oral candidiasis with FSC and FP) were similar among the treatment groups.

Conclusions: Treatment with FSC (FP, 250 μg, and SM, 50 μg) twice daily substantially improved morning lung function and sustained these improvements for over a period of 24 weeks compared with FP or SM treatment alone in patients with COPD, with no additional safety concerns for the combination treatment vs that with the individual components.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543