0
Clinical Investigations: PLEURAL EFFUSIONS |

Variations in Pleural Fluid WBC Count and Differential Counts With Different Sample Containers and Different Methods*

Barrett D. Conner; Y. C. Gary Lee; Paul Branca; Jeffrey T. Rogers; R. Michael Rodriguez; Richard W. Light
Author and Funding Information

*From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Saint Thomas Hospital and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Correspondence to: Richard W. Light, MD, FCCP, Director of Pulmonary Disease Program, St. Thomas Hospital, 4420 Harding Rd, Nashville, TN 37202; e-mail: rlight98@yahoo.com



Chest. 2003;123(4):1181-1187. doi:10.1378/chest.123.4.1181
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective: To compare the results of pleural fluid analysis for WBC counts and differential cell counts as follows: (1) counting performed manually vs that performed by an automated cell counter; (2) cells collected in different types of specimen containers; and (3) cell counts performed at 4 and 24 h postthoracentesis.

Methods: Twenty-eight pleural fluid samples were each collected in five different containers (ie, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treated glass, citrate-treated glass, heparinized glass, plain glass, and plain plastic tubes). The WBC counts and differential cell counts were obtained manually (on the EDTA tube) and with an automated counter on all tubes within 4 h of collection, and again after 24 h of refrigeration.

Results: There was a close correlation between the WBC counts obtained manually and those obtained with the automated counter from the pleural fluid samples collected in the EDTA tubes (r = 0.92). With the automated counter, the pleural fluid WBC counts were similar among the three tubes containing anticoagulants, but the counts obtained from the tubes without anticoagulants were significantly lower. The differential cell counts obtained manually and those obtained with the automated cell counter differed substantially. Although the percentage of lymphocytes was similar, the automated counter was inaccurate in differentiating neutrophils from large monocytes or mesothelial cells. The WBC counts obtained within 4 h of collection and 24 h after collection were virtually identical.

Conclusions: The WBC counts obtained manually and with the automated counter from pleural fluid samples in EDTA tubes correlated very closely. The pleural fluid WBC count was lower if the pleural fluids had been collected in tubes without an anticoagulant. Automated WBC counts from pleural fluid specimens were inaccurate, possibly due to difficulty in separating neutrophils from monocyte/mesothelial cells. Refrigerated storage for up to 24 h had no significant effect on the total WBC count or on the WBC count differential regardless of the tube utilized.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543