0
Clinical Investigations: PLEURA |

Is It Meaningful To Use Biochemical Parameters To Discriminate Between Transudative and Exudative Pleural Effusions?*

Santiago Romero-Candeira, MD; Luis Hernández, MD; Susana Romero-Brufao, MD; David Orts, MD; Cleofé Fernández, MD; Concepción Martín, MD
Author and Funding Information

*From Servicio de Neumología. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Spain.

Correspondence to: Santiago Romero-Candeira, MD, C/Italia, n° 30, Esc. 2a, 1° Dcha., 03003 Alicante, Spain; e-mail: romero_san@gva.es



Chest. 2002;122(5):1524-1529. doi:10.1378/chest.122.5.1524
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives: The usefulness of biochemical criteria to separate pleural transudates from exudates is controversial, and the limitations of Light’s criteria in patients receiving diuretic therapy is of general concern. We evaluated the added value of biochemical criteria to clinical judgment for separating transudates from exudates.

Setting: A community teaching hospital.

Design: A prospective, observational study for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.

Patients and measurements: In 249 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic thoracentesis, two physicians classified the pleural effusion as transudate or exudate based on all available information just before performing the thoracentesis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the clinical presumption were compared with those of Light’s criteria, and serum-pleural fluid albumin and protein gradients. The combined accuracy of biochemical and clinical criteria was also assessed.

Results: The accuracy of Light’s criteria (93%) was significantly higher than that showed by the initial clinical presumption (84%; p < 0.01) and that of the alternative biochemical criteria: serum-pleural fluid albumin gradient (87%; p < 0.03) and serum-pleural fluid protein gradient (86%; p < 0.01). In patients receiving diuretic therapy, the accuracy of Light’s criteria was 83% (60 of 72 cases), neither different to that of the albumin gradient (88%; 63 of 72 cases) nor to that of the protein gradient (86%; 62 of 72 cases). When these alternative biochemical criteria were applied exclusively to patients receiving diuretics who were thought to have a transudative effusion by clinical criteria, but having fluid identified as exudative by Light’s criteria, the results did not improve significantly. Using a multiparametric model for the population receiving diuretics, the accuracy was greater (93%; 67 of 72 cases) than that of Light’s criteria but without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.12).

Conclusions: Light’s criteria are significantly superior to the clinical presumption to separate pleural transudates from exudates. In patients receiving diuretics, Light’s criteria lose accuracy, which is similar to that showed by the use of alternative biochemical criteria alone or combined with clinical judgment.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543